Comparison Overview

Bay Photo

VS

Iron Fly Studios

Bay Photo

920 Disc Drive, Scotts Valley, CA, 95066, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Quality. Service. Innovation. Bay Photo Lab is a growing, cutting-edge company with a 40 year history of innovative photographic printing and photofinishing services. Located in Scotts Valley, California, nestled in the coastal redwoods slightly North of Santa Cruz, we provide photographers with the highest quality printing on many different substrates. We are a state of the art, technology-oriented company, that is committed to providing world class products and customer support. We have kept that promise by changing and adapting with the photo industry. We pride ourselves on our custom quality printing and fast delivery. Perfect every time.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Iron Fly Studios

109 Surrey Court, Smithville, MO, 64089, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Iron Fly Studios is a premier real estate photography & video production company. We specialize in high end commercial, residential and rural farm & ranch media productions with a focus on interlacing ground and aerial imagery to create world class video productions. Our team of experts have over 50 years of combined experience in onsite media capture, professional editing and final production medial and photography services. Some of the unique equipment and systems we use to create breathtaking results are: Ground video and imagery capture equipment. Aerial drone (multi-copter) photography equipment Full size helicopter video services Professional actors Creative design and script writing services Professional consulting services and much more...! Contact your Iron Fly Studios representative today for more information about how you can turn you real estate into a premier movie event... IRON FLY STUDIOS - putting property in motion..!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-photo-lab.jpeg
Bay Photo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-fly-studios.jpeg
Iron Fly Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bay Photo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Fly Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Photo in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Fly Studios in 2025.

Incident History — Bay Photo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Photo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Fly Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Fly Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-photo-lab.jpeg
Bay Photo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-fly-studios.jpeg
Iron Fly Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Iron Fly Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bay Photo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Iron Fly Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bay Photo company.

In the current year, Iron Fly Studios company and Bay Photo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iron Fly Studios company nor Bay Photo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iron Fly Studios company nor Bay Photo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iron Fly Studios company nor Bay Photo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bay Photo company nor Iron Fly Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bay Photo company nor Iron Fly Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bay Photo company employs more people globally than Iron Fly Studios company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bay Photo nor Iron Fly Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N