Comparison Overview

Bay Children's Services

VS

Autism Spectrum Interventions

Bay Children's Services

3030 Ashby Avenue, None, Berkeley, CA, US, 94705
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749

Bay Children's Services (BCS), formerly the Bay Area Children's Association, is a non-profit dedicated to advocacy, research and innovative mental health treatment using technology and other available resources. Our mission is to fix the broken mental health care system by: -Understanding and advocating for public policy changes -Researching and validating the most up to date and innovative mental health treatment -Developing tools to enhance clinicians ability to provide care -Teaching clinicians to effectively practice evidence-based medicine within the current healthcare system Our sister organization Bay Area Clinical Associates provides direct mental health services in Menlo Park, Oakland and San Jose. See their website for job postings or to request mental health services: www.baca.org

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Autism Spectrum Interventions

713 W. Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, CA, 92832, US
Last Update: 2025-10-29
Between 750 and 799

Autism Spectrum Interventions (ASI) is founded on the principle that all individuals with special needs deserve quality services. The primary goal for every ASI client is that they reach their full potential. ASI specializes in empirically established, Intensive Behavioral Intervention based on the principles of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). ASI works collaboratively with families to ensure that the services provided are targeting the needs of each specific individual and his or her family.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-childrens-services.jpeg
Bay Children's Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-spectrum-interventions.jpeg
Autism Spectrum Interventions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bay Children's Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Autism Spectrum Interventions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Children's Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autism Spectrum Interventions in 2026.

Incident History — Bay Children's Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Children's Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Autism Spectrum Interventions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autism Spectrum Interventions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-childrens-services.jpeg
Bay Children's Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-spectrum-interventions.jpeg
Autism Spectrum Interventions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Autism Spectrum Interventions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bay Children's Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bay Children's Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Autism Spectrum Interventions company has not reported any.

In the current year, Autism Spectrum Interventions company and Bay Children's Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Autism Spectrum Interventions company nor Bay Children's Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bay Children's Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Autism Spectrum Interventions company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Autism Spectrum Interventions company nor Bay Children's Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bay Children's Services company nor Autism Spectrum Interventions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bay Children's Services company nor Autism Spectrum Interventions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Autism Spectrum Interventions company employs more people globally than Bay Children's Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bay Children's Services nor Autism Spectrum Interventions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N