Comparison Overview

Bay Central Printing

VS

Metalphoto of Cincinnati

Bay Central Printing

None
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.baycentralprinting.com

Bay Central Printing was thought of and created by people with a rich printing history. We have assembled a team of printing professionals to service all your printing, copying, graphic, and mailing needs. We love what we do. Our philosophy is to become your full fledged printer, helping you get your printing needs produced on-time, within budget, and with the highest standards of quality. We're proud of the over 30 years of service in our community. We pride ourselves on being a complete source for all of your business printing needs and have always been on the leading edge of technology. We understand that an investment in technology can actually save money by improving efficiencies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Metalphoto of Cincinnati

1080 Skillman Drive, Cincinnati, 45215, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mpofcinci.com/

Advanced printing and fabrication capabilities make MPC a leading U.S. manufacturer of industrial data plates, equipment front panels and overlays. We also manufacture a variety of labels and tags for asset identification and tracking, as well as signs for indoor and outdoor applications. MPC is one of the world's largest converters of Metalphoto photosensitive anodized aluminum, which is used for its long-term durability and performance in applications from plaques & awards, outdoor signage, weaponry identification, industrial components for OEM's, and the international space station.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-central-printing.jpeg
Bay Central Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpofcinci.jpeg
Metalphoto of Cincinnati
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bay Central Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metalphoto of Cincinnati
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Central Printing in 2026.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metalphoto of Cincinnati in 2026.

Incident History — Bay Central Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Central Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metalphoto of Cincinnati (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metalphoto of Cincinnati cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-central-printing.jpeg
Bay Central Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpofcinci.jpeg
Metalphoto of Cincinnati
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bay Central Printing company and Metalphoto of Cincinnati company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Metalphoto of Cincinnati company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bay Central Printing company.

In the current year, Metalphoto of Cincinnati company and Bay Central Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metalphoto of Cincinnati company nor Bay Central Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metalphoto of Cincinnati company nor Bay Central Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metalphoto of Cincinnati company nor Bay Central Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bay Central Printing company nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bay Central Printing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Metalphoto of Cincinnati company.

Metalphoto of Cincinnati company employs more people globally than Bay Central Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bay Central Printing nor Metalphoto of Cincinnati holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References