Comparison Overview

Bay Area Clinical Associates

VS

Mental Health Association in New Jersey

Bay Area Clinical Associates

1530 Meridian Ave, 200, San Jose, California, US, 95125
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.baca.org/

Welcome to Bay Area Clinical Associates! Since 2007, our team of clinicians has been providing innovative mental health services to young individuals and families across the San Francisco Bay Area. We are dedicated to treating mental illness in our patients and guiding them toward cultivating positive habits and unlocking their maximum potential. What sets us apart is our unwavering dedication to administering evidence-based treatment to young individuals dealing with mental health challenges. Our collaborative approach involves a diverse treatment team comprising proficient psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, licensed marriage & family therapists, as well as pre-licensed clinicians, all working cohesively within an integrated care framework. BACA's commitment extends to fostering an exceptional work environment for clinicians, aiming to be the top choice for Bay Area professionals in the field.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mental Health Association in New Jersey

673 Morris Ave., Springfield, NJ, 07081, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mhanj.org

The mission of the Mental Health Association in New Jersey strives for mental health for children and adults through advocacy, education, training, and services. We are dedicated to promoting good mental health for all New Jersyans, reducing the barriers that prevent too many people from seeking or offering help and support, and building a stronger base of support and network of services for people with mental health challenges.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-area-clinical-associates-p-c.jpeg
Bay Area Clinical Associates
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mental-health-association-in-new-jersey.jpeg
Mental Health Association in New Jersey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bay Area Clinical Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mental Health Association in New Jersey
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Area Clinical Associates in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mental Health Association in New Jersey in 2026.

Incident History — Bay Area Clinical Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Area Clinical Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mental Health Association in New Jersey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mental Health Association in New Jersey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-area-clinical-associates-p-c.jpeg
Bay Area Clinical Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mental-health-association-in-new-jersey.jpeg
Mental Health Association in New Jersey
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bay Area Clinical Associates company and Mental Health Association in New Jersey company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mental Health Association in New Jersey company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bay Area Clinical Associates company.

In the current year, Mental Health Association in New Jersey company and Bay Area Clinical Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mental Health Association in New Jersey company nor Bay Area Clinical Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mental Health Association in New Jersey company nor Bay Area Clinical Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mental Health Association in New Jersey company nor Bay Area Clinical Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates company nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mental Health Association in New Jersey company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bay Area Clinical Associates company.

Mental Health Association in New Jersey company employs more people globally than Bay Area Clinical Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates nor Mental Health Association in New Jersey holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References