Comparison Overview

Baton Rouge Parents Magazine

VS

Top Cow Productions

Baton Rouge Parents Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Monthly parenting publication with parents and families as our markets. Our primary goal is to provide information for parents and families in the Greater Baton Rouge area. In addition, we have a vision to partner with large and small businesses that share our core value, “What the child becomes, the community becomes.” We firmly believe in that core value, and so our resources are devoted to providing necessary information to help parents and families raise healthy, happy families and productive children. The success of our publication results from a heartfelt and profound commitment to children, families and the community we call home.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Top Cow Productions

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Top Cow Productions, Inc., a Los Angeles-based entertainment company, was founded in December of 1992 by artist Marc Silvestri, who also co-founded Image Comics earlier that same year. Top Cow currently publishes its line of comic books in 21 languages in over 55 different countries. The company has launched 20 franchises (18 original and two licensed) in the industry’s Top 10, seven at #1, a feat accomplished by no other publisher in the last two decades.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baton-rouge-parents-magazine.jpeg
Baton Rouge Parents Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baton Rouge Parents Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Top Cow Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baton Rouge Parents Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Top Cow Productions in 2025.

Incident History — Baton Rouge Parents Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baton Rouge Parents Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Top Cow Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Top Cow Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baton-rouge-parents-magazine.jpeg
Baton Rouge Parents Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Top Cow Productions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Top Cow Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company.

In the current year, Top Cow Productions company and Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company nor Top Cow Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company nor Top Cow Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Top Cow Productions company employs more people globally than Baton Rouge Parents Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baton Rouge Parents Magazine nor Top Cow Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.