Comparison Overview

Bath Preservation Trust

VS

Walker Art Center

Bath Preservation Trust

Bath, GB, BA1 5NA
Last Update: 2025-12-03

About Us. Bath Preservation Trust was founded in 1934 as a small pressure group, with the object of protecting the city's unique architectural heritage. Bath is many things to many people but we want it to be a place for everyone which can positively adapt to Climate Change and continue to evolve through sustainable and holistic design-led development, to complement and add value to its global reputation as a living heritage city. Encircled by beautiful countryside, bisected by the River Avon and with an abundance of trees, open spaces and parklands, Bath also has striking architecture, a vibrant economy and engaged communities. It has immense potential to be a net zero carbon, liveable, green city. We believe Bath deserves excellence in design and contemporary sustainable development which is inclusive of all people, and improves social and economic opportunities without compromising our unparalleled built heritage and natural environment. BPT works independently and in partnership with a broad range of other statutory and non-statutory partners to: Deliver our commitment to sustainable development for Bath and demonstrate the value of heritage in a changing world Advocate and campaign for the total public realm, a healthy environment and a thriving living city Champion forward-thinking and appropriate sustainable architecture and design worthy of the World Heritage City of Bath Provide opportunities for learning for people of all ages in all areas of our work, supporting personal wellbeing and social inclusion Fundamentally, we are an organisation which seeks positive and constructive solutions to the present and future threats faced by Bath, its rural environs and the people, communities and businesses it supports. BPT is also a major enabler of the tourist economy, providing museums and educational activities at No. 1 Royal Crescent, the Museum of Bath Architecture, Beckford’s Tower and Landscape and the Herschel Museum of Astronomy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Walker Art Center

725 Vineland Place, None, Minneapolis, MN, US, 55403
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Walker Art Center is a catalyst for the creative expression of artists and the active engagement of audiences. Focusing on the visual, performing, and media arts of our time, the Walker takes a global, multidisciplinary, and diverse approach to the creation, presentation, interpretation, collection, and preservation of art. Walker programs examine the questions that shape and inspire us as individuals, cultures, and communities. Learn about current opportunities at the Walker at: walkerart.org/jobs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 249
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bath-preservation-trust.jpeg
Bath Preservation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-art-center.jpeg
Walker Art Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bath Preservation Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Walker Art Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bath Preservation Trust in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker Art Center in 2025.

Incident History — Bath Preservation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bath Preservation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Walker Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bath-preservation-trust.jpeg
Bath Preservation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-art-center.jpeg
Walker Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Walker Art Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bath Preservation Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Walker Art Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bath Preservation Trust company.

In the current year, Walker Art Center company and Bath Preservation Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Walker Art Center company nor Bath Preservation Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Walker Art Center company nor Bath Preservation Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Walker Art Center company nor Bath Preservation Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust company nor Walker Art Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bath Preservation Trust company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Walker Art Center company.

Walker Art Center company employs more people globally than Bath Preservation Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust nor Walker Art Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X