Comparison Overview

Batch, Poore & Williams, PC

VS

Bradley Murchison

Batch, Poore & Williams, PC

5540 Centerview Dr, Raleigh, 27606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Batch, Poore, & Williams, PC law firm in Raleigh is where clients come first. We're proud of our proven ability to provide client-friendly family law, criminal defense, business law and estate planning attorneys to protect your rights and best interests. We build lasting relationships with our clients through trust, attentiveness and superior client service. Whether you're a couple contemplating divorce, a young family with estate planning goals, or an aspiring North Carolina businessperson about to open your own company, make Batch & Poore your home for astute advice and quality representation. Contact us today to get started.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bradley Murchison

401 EDWARDS ST., SUITE 1000, SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA, 71101-5529, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bradley Murchison Kelly & Shea was formed in February, 2009 by a group of lawyers who had practiced together for many years in a large, well established law firm. Nine partners from the Shreveport office and eight from the New Orleans office of the firm, many listed in Chambers USA®, The Best Lawyers in America ® and Super Lawyers ®, most with AV ® ratings, found common ground in our dedication to high standards of professionalism and in the quality of service we deliver to our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/batch-poore-&-williams-llp.jpeg
Batch, Poore & Williams, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley-murchison-kelly-&-shea-llc.jpeg
Bradley Murchison
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Batch, Poore & Williams, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bradley Murchison
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Batch, Poore & Williams, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bradley Murchison in 2025.

Incident History — Batch, Poore & Williams, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Batch, Poore & Williams, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bradley Murchison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bradley Murchison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/batch-poore-&-williams-llp.jpeg
Batch, Poore & Williams, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley-murchison-kelly-&-shea-llc.jpeg
Bradley Murchison
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bradley Murchison company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bradley Murchison company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company.

In the current year, Bradley Murchison company and Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bradley Murchison company nor Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bradley Murchison company nor Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bradley Murchison company nor Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company nor Bradley Murchison company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company nor Bradley Murchison company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bradley Murchison company employs more people globally than Batch, Poore & Williams, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Batch, Poore & Williams, PC nor Bradley Murchison holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X