Comparison Overview

Bartlett Public Library District

VS

East Bonner County Library District

Bartlett Public Library District

800 S. Bartlett Rd., Bartlett, 60103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Bartlett Public Library District plays an essential role in our community. We offer access to eSources, downloadable books, music and periodicals and, more importantly, we work with our patrons to make sure they are familiar with all library services and how to use them. The Library provides a friendly environment for group study and computer usage, and strives to create a welcoming environment for all. The Bartlett Public Library District Board and staff go above and beyond to meet our patrons’ needs, and make sure that the Bartlett Library truly is the Best Place to Learn and Discover.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

East Bonner County Library District

1407 Cedar St, Sandpoint, Idaho, 83864-2052, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The East Bonner County Library District provides open access to opportunities for discovery, connection, and lifelong learning. A public library system, it encompasses the eastern portion of Bonner County, Idaho, with a service population of 31,669 and 26,387 registered borrowers, as of 2013. The main branch library is located in Sandpoint, the county seat, with a smaller branch located in the town of Clark Fork, 26 miles to the east. A Bookmobile serves outlying areas Monday through Thursday, as well as the Sandpoint Farmer’s Market every Saturday during the summer. The website hosts a Digital Library with electronic materials.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bartlett-public-library-district.jpeg
Bartlett Public Library District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bonner-county-library.jpeg
East Bonner County Library District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bartlett Public Library District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
East Bonner County Library District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bartlett Public Library District in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East Bonner County Library District in 2025.

Incident History — Bartlett Public Library District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bartlett Public Library District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — East Bonner County Library District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East Bonner County Library District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bartlett-public-library-district.jpeg
Bartlett Public Library District
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bonner-county-library.jpeg
East Bonner County Library District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

East Bonner County Library District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bartlett Public Library District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bartlett Public Library District company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas East Bonner County Library District company has not reported any.

In the current year, East Bonner County Library District company and Bartlett Public Library District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Bartlett Public Library District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while East Bonner County Library District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither East Bonner County Library District company nor Bartlett Public Library District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither East Bonner County Library District company nor Bartlett Public Library District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District company nor East Bonner County Library District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District company nor East Bonner County Library District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bartlett Public Library District company employs more people globally than East Bonner County Library District company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bartlett Public Library District nor East Bonner County Library District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H