Comparison Overview

Barrett Reporting, Inc

VS

Office of the Public Defender Maryland

Barrett Reporting, Inc

1922 N Broadway, Santa Ana, California, 92706, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Barrett Reporting provides court reporters, videographers, interpreters and conference suites for depositions, court trials, hearings, meetings and conferences. We pride ourselves on customer service and responsiveness to our clients' needs at the most competitive rates. Barrett Reporting provides Complimentary Conference Suites wherever you need for as long as our reporter is utilized and we produce a minimum deposition transcript for you. Call us Toll Free at (888) 740-1100 to schedule today!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Office of the Public Defender Maryland

6 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The mission of the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) is to provide superior legal representation to indigent defendants in the State of Maryland by safeguarding fundamental individual rights and ensuring access to the guaranteed protections afforded by the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Maryland Constitution and Declaration of Rights, and the laws of Maryland.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 843
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barrett-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Barrett Reporting, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-public-defender-maryland.jpeg
Office of the Public Defender Maryland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barrett Reporting, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Office of the Public Defender Maryland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barrett Reporting, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Office of the Public Defender Maryland in 2025.

Incident History — Barrett Reporting, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barrett Reporting, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Office of the Public Defender Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office of the Public Defender Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barrett-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Barrett Reporting, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-public-defender-maryland.jpeg
Office of the Public Defender Maryland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barrett Reporting, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Office of the Public Defender Maryland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Office of the Public Defender Maryland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barrett Reporting, Inc company.

In the current year, Office of the Public Defender Maryland company and Barrett Reporting, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Office of the Public Defender Maryland company nor Barrett Reporting, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Office of the Public Defender Maryland company nor Barrett Reporting, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Office of the Public Defender Maryland company nor Barrett Reporting, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc company nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc company nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Office of the Public Defender Maryland company employs more people globally than Barrett Reporting, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc nor Office of the Public Defender Maryland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X