Comparison Overview

Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS)

VS

Clínica Universidad de Navarra

Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS)

Bowling Green, Kentucky, US, 42102
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Barren River Area Safe Space is the regional domestic violence shelter & program serving the BRADD region of southcentral, Kentucky. The mission of the Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. is to provide safety and support to victims of domestic violence and their children and empower them with opportunities that lead them to self-sufficiency. We educate our community about domestic violence to help identify and spark change, and we advocate to protect the rights of individuals so everyone in our community can be free from abuse.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clínica Universidad de Navarra

Av. Pío XII, 36, Pamplona, Navarra, ES, 31008
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

La Clínica de la Universidad de Navarra es un centro médico-hospitalario caracterizado por su alto grado de especialización médica, su constante renovación tecnológica, y su trabajo en equipo, que permite una valoración multidisciplinar y personalizada de cada paciente. Fue creada en 1961 y forma parte de la Universidad de Navarra. Por ello, la investigación, docencia y asistencia se realizan junto con las Facultades de Medicina, Ciencias y Farmacia, la Escuela de Enfermería y el Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA). La Clínica Universidad de Navarra es una institución privada sin ánimo de lucro guiada por los principios cristianos.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 1,472
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barren-river-area-safe-space.jpeg
Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clínica Universidad de Navarra in 2025.

Incident History — Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clínica Universidad de Navarra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clínica Universidad de Navarra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barren-river-area-safe-space.jpeg
Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinica-universidad-de-navarra.jpeg
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clínica Universidad de Navarra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clínica Universidad de Navarra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company.

In the current year, Clínica Universidad de Navarra company and Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clínica Universidad de Navarra company nor Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clínica Universidad de Navarra company nor Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clínica Universidad de Navarra company nor Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clínica Universidad de Navarra company employs more people globally than Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barren River Area Safe Space, Inc. (BRASS) nor Clínica Universidad de Navarra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H