Comparison Overview

Barreau du Québec

VS

Newton Kight LLP

Barreau du Québec

445, boulevard Saint-Laurent, Montréal, Québec, H2Y3T8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Afin d'assurer la protection du public, le Barreau du Québec maximise les liens de confiance entre les avocats et les avocates, le public et l'État. Pour ce faire, le Barreau : - surveille l'exercice de la profession, - fait la promotion de la primauté du droit, - valorise la profession - et soutient les membres dans l'exercice du droit. Groupe du Barreau sur LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206718&trk=myg_ugrp_ovr Le Barreau sur Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/barreauduquebec Le Barreau sur Twitter : https://twitter.com/BarreauduQuebec Le blogue du DG du Barreau : http://bloguedg.barreau.qc.ca/ Le Droit de Savoir, une émission de télévision coproduite par le Barreau du Québec et Télé-Québec et diffusée à Canal Savoir : http://www.ledroitdesavoir.ca/ Droit de Cité, une émission radio coproduite par le Barreau du Québec, Juripop et CIBL 101,5 Montréal, en partenariat avec Faits et Cause : http://droitdecite.info/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 357
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newton Kight LLP

1820 32nd Street, Everett, wa, 98201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

One of the oldest existing law firms in Snohomish County, the firm now known as Newton Kight L.L.P. was originally founded by Clifford Newton in 1913, in Everett, Washington. In 1920, he was joined by his brother, Arthur Newton, and they formed the firm of Newton and Newton. Henry Newton, the son of Arthur Newton, joined the practice in 1961. Michael Kight, a friend of Henry's from undergraduate and law school at the University of Washington, joined the practice in 1967, and it became known as Newton, Newton & Kight. The firm continued to grow and in 1996 became a limited liability partnership known as Newton Kight L.L.P.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barreau-du-qu-bec.jpeg
Barreau du Québec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-kight-llp.jpeg
Newton Kight LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barreau du Québec
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newton Kight LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barreau du Québec in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newton Kight LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Barreau du Québec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barreau du Québec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newton Kight LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newton Kight LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barreau-du-qu-bec.jpeg
Barreau du Québec
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-kight-llp.jpeg
Newton Kight LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Barreau du Québec company and Newton Kight LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Newton Kight LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barreau du Québec company.

In the current year, Newton Kight LLP company and Barreau du Québec company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newton Kight LLP company nor Barreau du Québec company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newton Kight LLP company nor Barreau du Québec company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newton Kight LLP company nor Barreau du Québec company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barreau du Québec company nor Newton Kight LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barreau du Québec company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Newton Kight LLP company.

Barreau du Québec company employs more people globally than Newton Kight LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barreau du Québec nor Newton Kight LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X