Comparison Overview

Barn Theatre

VS

The A.C.T. Conservatory

Barn Theatre

5 Beeches Road, Cirencester, England, GL7 1BN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Barn is a theatrical producing house and registered charity, presenting seven new productions annually within our intimate 200-seater venue in Cirencester. Since opening in 2018, our mission has been to create some of the UK’s most inspiring professional theatre while providing a nurturing platform for developing talent. We believe that stories told with wit, flair and passion have the power to change lives. Our programme is broad and ambitious, consisting of new work, family entertainment, musical theatre and reinterpretations of beloved classics. Our commitment was recognized by the Stage Awards’ Best Fringe Theatre in 2019. We remain steadfast in our dedication to theatrical excellence within the heart of the Cotswolds. Please get in touch if you would like to collaborate.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The A.C.T. Conservatory

415 Geary St, San Francisco, California, 94102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

A.C.T.’s Conservatory training programs prepare actors of all ages and experience levels to explore their craft and grow as artists. Our Young Conservatory helps young artists ages 8–19 gain the confidence and skills to succeed both on- and offstage, while Studio A.C.T. helps adults expand their creativity through part-time, professional caliber theater classes. Led by Artistic Director Pam MacKinnon, Executive Director Jennifer Bielstein, and Conservatory Director Melissa Smith, A.C.T.’s academic programs—the Master of Fine Arts Program, Summer Training Congress, and San Francisco Semester—provide comprehensive training for aspiring and professional actors seeking a lifelong investment and career in the theater.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barntheatre.jpeg
Barn Theatre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-conservatory-theater.jpeg
The A.C.T. Conservatory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barn Theatre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The A.C.T. Conservatory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barn Theatre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The A.C.T. Conservatory in 2025.

Incident History — Barn Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barn Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The A.C.T. Conservatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The A.C.T. Conservatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barntheatre.jpeg
Barn Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-conservatory-theater.jpeg
The A.C.T. Conservatory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The A.C.T. Conservatory company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barn Theatre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The A.C.T. Conservatory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barn Theatre company.

In the current year, The A.C.T. Conservatory company and Barn Theatre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The A.C.T. Conservatory company nor Barn Theatre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The A.C.T. Conservatory company nor Barn Theatre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The A.C.T. Conservatory company nor Barn Theatre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barn Theatre company nor The A.C.T. Conservatory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barn Theatre company nor The A.C.T. Conservatory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The A.C.T. Conservatory company employs more people globally than Barn Theatre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barn Theatre nor The A.C.T. Conservatory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N