Comparison Overview

Barking Irons

VS

HUGO BOSS

Barking Irons

1 Centre St Rm 1012, New York City, NY 10012, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Barking Irons is based out New York City, NY, United States.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HUGO BOSS

Holy-Allee 3, Metzingen, Baden-Wรผrttemberg, 72555, DE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

At HUGO BOSS, we firmly believe that the passion and dedication of our employees is the essence for the successful execution of our โ€œCLAIM 5โ€ growth strategy. A strong commitment to empowering people and teams is therefore firmly anchored in โ€œCLAIM 5โ€. In this context, our HUGO BOSS values โ€“ entrepreneurial spirit, personal ownership, team mentality, simplicity & quality, and youthful spirit โ€“ play a key role. They form the guiding principle for day-to-day cooperation and are intended to foster a spirit of mutual trust. The aim is to create an environment that enables all employees to develop their individual talents and thus directly contribute to the success of โ€œCLAIM 5โ€. On top of that, HUGO BOSS intends to continue positioning itself as one of the most attractive employers in the fashion industry. This, in turn, should enable us to attract the best talents in the sector.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 15,186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barking-irons.jpeg
Barking Irons
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hugo-boss.jpeg
HUGO BOSS
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Barking Irons
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HUGO BOSS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barking Irons in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUGO BOSS in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Barking Irons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barking Irons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” HUGO BOSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUGO BOSS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barking-irons.jpeg
Barking Irons
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hugo-boss.jpeg
HUGO BOSS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Barking Irons company and HUGO BOSS company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, HUGO BOSS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barking Irons company.

In the current year, HUGO BOSS company and Barking Irons company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HUGO BOSS company nor Barking Irons company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HUGO BOSS company nor Barking Irons company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HUGO BOSS company nor Barking Irons company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barking Irons company nor HUGO BOSS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barking Irons company nor HUGO BOSS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HUGO BOSS company employs more people globally than Barking Irons company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Volto is a ReactJS-based frontend for the Plone Content Management System. Versions 16.34.0 and below, 17.0.0 through 17.22.1, 18.0.0 through 18.27.1, and 19.0.0-alpha.1 through 19.0.0-alpha.5, an anonymous user could cause the NodeJS server part of Volto to quit with an error when visiting a specific URL. This issue is fixed in versions 16.34.1, 17.22.2, 18.27.2 and 19.0.0-alpha.6.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Traccar is an open source GPS tracking system. Default installs of Traccar on Windows between versions 6.1- 6.8.1 and non default installs between versions 5.8 - 6.0 are vulnerable to unauthenticated local file inclusion attacks which can lead to leakage of passwords or any file on the file system including the Traccar configuration file. Versions 5.8 - 6.0 are only vulnerable if <entry key='web.override'>./override</entry> is set in the configuration file. Versions 6.1 - 6.8.1 are vulnerable by default as the web override is enabled by default. The vulnerable code is removed in version 6.9.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Stalwart is a mail and collaboration server. Versions 0.13.3 and below contain an unbounded memory allocation vulnerability in the IMAP protocol parser which allows remote attackers to exhaust server memory, potentially triggering the system's out-of-memory (OOM) killer and causing a denial of service. The CommandParser implementation enforces size limits on its dynamic buffer in most parsing states, but several state handlers omit these validation checks. This issue is fixed in version 0.13.4. A workaround for this issue is to implement rate limiting and connection monitoring at the network level, however this does not provide complete protection.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain a Broken Access Control vulnerability, identified in the get_relatorios_socios.php endpoint. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to directly access sensitive personal and financial information of members without requiring authentication or authorization. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain an Open Redirect vulnerability, identified in the control.php endpoint, specifically in the nextPage parameter (metodo=listarUmnomeClasse=FuncionarioControle). This vulnerability allows attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external domains, enabling phishing campaigns, malicious payload distribution, or user credential theft. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X