Comparison Overview

Barker Martin, PS

VS

Sceales Lawyers

Barker Martin, PS

719 Second Ave., Seattle, WA, 98104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Responsive Associations, like all businesses, need a law firm that is responsive. The attorneys and staff at Barker Martin understand that an association often has deadlines by which the board must meet and discuss particular issues. That is why we prioritize direct and timely communication with our clients. Focused Representing associations is what we do. Unlike huge law firms that have many practice areas, we do not represent developers, contractors or subcontractors. This focus means that we concentrate on homeowner association issues on a daily basis and are familiar with the latest changes in statutes and cases affecting associations. Proven When you hire Barker Martin, you hire a team of experienced professionals who will work tirelessly to resolve your claim or issue in the most timely and efficient manner possible. We are proud of our proven track record.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sceales Lawyers

68 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Sceales Lawyers is a Perth-based law firm established in 1994 by Robert Sceales. We advise principally in relation to taxation, general commercial, trusts, wills and estate matters. Our clients include accountants, solicitors, large and small private and public companies, family businesses, charities and non-profit funds, Aboriginal endowment foundations, and private individuals. We regularly advise on instructions from accounting and other law firms for their clients, with complete respect for their on-going client relationships. We pride ourselves on providing expert advice and documentation, quick and cost-effective delivery of services, direct communication, clear solutions, and utmost confidentiality of service.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barker-martin-ps.jpeg
Barker Martin, PS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sceales-&-company.jpeg
Sceales Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barker Martin, PS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sceales Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barker Martin, PS in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sceales Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Barker Martin, PS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barker Martin, PS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sceales Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sceales Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barker-martin-ps.jpeg
Barker Martin, PS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sceales-&-company.jpeg
Sceales Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sceales Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barker Martin, PS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sceales Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barker Martin, PS company.

In the current year, Sceales Lawyers company and Barker Martin, PS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sceales Lawyers company nor Barker Martin, PS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sceales Lawyers company nor Barker Martin, PS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sceales Lawyers company nor Barker Martin, PS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barker Martin, PS company nor Sceales Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barker Martin, PS company nor Sceales Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Barker Martin, PS company employs more people globally than Sceales Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barker Martin, PS nor Sceales Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X