Comparison Overview

Barclays Investment Bank

VS

CIMB

Barclays Investment Bank

745 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10019
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.barclays.com/ib

Barclays Investment Bank deploys financial solutions to help our clients with their funding, financing, strategic and risk management needs across sectors, markets and economies. The Investment Bank is comprised of the Investment Banking, International Corporate Banking, Global Markets and Research businesses, aiding money managers, financial institutions, governments, supranational organisations and corporate clients around the globe. We offer a full spectrum of strategic advisory, financing and risk management solutions to help drive innovation and growth. For over 330 years, our commitment to shared success has been at the heart of what we do, because we are all at our best when we all progress. For further information about Barclays Investment Bank, please visit our website www.barclays.com/ib

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 20,784
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CIMB

Menara CIMB, Kuala Lumpur Sentral, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 50470
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cimb.com

CIMB Group is a leading ASEAN universal bank, one of the largest Asian investment banks and one of the world's largest Islamic banks. We are headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and offer consumer banking, commercial banking, wholesale banking, Islamic banking, and asset management products and services. As the fifth largest banking group in ASEAN, we have over 36,000 staff in 16 locations across ASEAN, Asia and beyond. CIMB Bank and CIMB Islamic Bank are members of PIDM.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,774
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investmentbank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimbmalaysia.jpeg
CIMB
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barclays Investment Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CIMB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays Investment Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIMB in 2025.

Incident History — Barclays Investment Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays Investment Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CIMB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIMB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investmentbank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimbmalaysia.jpeg
CIMB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barclays Investment Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIMB company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CIMB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barclays Investment Bank company.

In the current year, CIMB company and Barclays Investment Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CIMB company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CIMB company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CIMB company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank company nor CIMB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barclays Investment Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CIMB company.

Barclays Investment Bank company employs more people globally than CIMB company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor CIMB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References