Comparison Overview

Barclays Investment Bank

VS

Bajaj Finserv

Barclays Investment Bank

745 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Barclays Investment Bank deploys financial solutions to help our clients with their funding, financing, strategic and risk management needs across sectors, markets and economies. The Investment Bank is comprised of the Investment Banking, International Corporate Banking, Global Markets and Research businesses, aiding money managers, financial institutions, governments, supranational organisations and corporate clients around the globe. We offer a full spectrum of strategic advisory, financing and risk management solutions to help drive innovation and growth. For over 330 years, our commitment to shared success has been at the heart of what we do, because we are all at our best when we all progress. For further information about Barclays Investment Bank, please visit our website www.barclays.com/ib

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21,686
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv House, Sakore Nagar Rd, Viman Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411014
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Founded in April 2007, Bajaj Finserv is the financial arm of the Bajaj group. We believe in a simple philosophy to never settle for good and go for great. This reflects in our extensive product portfolio that spans across 3 broad categories- lending, insurance and wealth advisory. With 24 products spread across 12 product lines, we're one of the fastest growing and most diversified NBFCs in India. Our footprint spans the length and breadth of India.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 64,942
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investment-bank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barclays Investment Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bajaj Finserv
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays Investment Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj Finserv in 2025.

Incident History — Barclays Investment Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays Investment Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bajaj Finserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj Finserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investment-bank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bajaj Finserv company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barclays Investment Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bajaj Finserv company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barclays Investment Bank company.

In the current year, Bajaj Finserv company and Barclays Investment Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bajaj Finserv company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barclays Investment Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bajaj Finserv company.

Bajaj Finserv company employs more people globally than Barclays Investment Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank nor Bajaj Finserv holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N