Comparison Overview

Barclays

VS

Franklin Templeton

Barclays

1 Churchill Place, London, GB, E14 5HP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.home.barclays

Barclays is a British universal bank. Our vision is to be the UK-centred leader in global finance. We are a diversified bank with comprehensive UK consumer, corporate and wealth and private banking franchises, a leading investment bank and a strong, specialist US consumer bank. Through these five divisions, we are working together for a better financial future for our customers, clients and communities. With over 325 years of history and expertise in banking, Barclays operates in over 40 countries and employs approximately 83,500 people. Barclays moves, lends, invests and protects money for customers and clients worldwide. Barclays is a trading name of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries. Barclays Bank PLC is registered in England and is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1026167. Registered office: 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 76,977
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Franklin Templeton

Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.franklinresources.com

Franklin Resources, Inc. [NYSE:BEN] is a global investment management organization with subsidiaries operating as Franklin Templeton (www.franklinresources.com). The products, services, information and materials referenced in this site may not be available to residents in certain jurisdictions. Consult with an investment professional or contact your local Franklin Templeton office for more information. This site and the information contained herein is not intended to constitute an offer to sell or an invitation or solicitation of an offer to buy any product or service by Franklin Templeton. Nothing in this website should be construed as investment, tax, legal or other advice. All investments involve risks, including potential loss of principal. LinkedIn is owned by a third party unaffiliated with us. We are not responsible for LinkedIn’s privacy, security, or terms of use policies that control this service, nor their content, software, or tools (or those of any third party’s) that are available through links from this page. You use any third-party site/media, software and materials at your own risk. US readers: This material is being distributed in the U.S. by Franklin Distributors, LLC. Member FINRA/SIPC and only offers U.S. registered Franklin Templeton products. View our Terms and Conditions at: https://www.franklintempleton.com/help/social-media-guidelines/linkedin-guidelines Non-US readers: View our Terms and Conditions at https://www.franklinresources.com/resources/linkedin ©2022 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,814
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin-templeton.jpeg
Franklin Templeton
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barclays
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Franklin Templeton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin Templeton in 2025.

Incident History — Barclays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Franklin Templeton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin Templeton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin-templeton.jpeg
Franklin Templeton
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barclays company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Franklin Templeton company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Franklin Templeton company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barclays company.

In the current year, Franklin Templeton company and Barclays company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Franklin Templeton company nor Barclays company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Franklin Templeton company nor Barclays company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Franklin Templeton company nor Barclays company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barclays company nor Franklin Templeton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barclays company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Franklin Templeton company.

Barclays company employs more people globally than Franklin Templeton company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barclays nor Franklin Templeton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References