Comparison Overview

Barberton Public Library

VS

Graves County Public Library

Barberton Public Library

602 West Park Avenue, Barberton, OH, US, 44203-2458
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Barberton Public Library will promote independent thought and community interaction by providing services and resources necessary for individuals to pursue educational, creative, personal, and professional interests. The Library offers weekly programs for children, families, teens and adults. Through a partnership with Summa Hospital, the Library maintains a full service branch located on the first floor of the Barberton hospital with the focus of consumer health information. Serving the community since 1903, the library is governed by a seven member board of trustees which set the policy and direction of library services. Since 2014, the Barberton Public Library is also the site of the College Now! Greater Cleveland office serving Summit County.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graves County Public Library

601 N 17th St, Mayfield, KY, US, 42066
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Established in 1940, the Graves County Public Library is located in Mayfield, Kentucky. The library fosters and promotes lifelong involvement in the pleasure of reading and learning with special emphasis on support for students at all academic levels. We support the Library Bill of Rights and the Freedom to Read Statement. We are members of the Graves County Chamber of Commerce. The Library offers a variety of electronic databases, ebooks, books, and DVD checkouts, book clubs, and many other services at no cost to patrons. We are committed to providing the best to Graves County, Kentucky.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barberton-public-library.jpeg
Barberton Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gravescountypubliclibrary.jpeg
Graves County Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barberton Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graves County Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barberton Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graves County Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Barberton Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barberton Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graves County Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graves County Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barberton-public-library.jpeg
Barberton Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gravescountypubliclibrary.jpeg
Graves County Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graves County Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barberton Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Graves County Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Barberton Public Library company.

In the current year, Graves County Public Library company and Barberton Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graves County Public Library company nor Barberton Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graves County Public Library company nor Barberton Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graves County Public Library company nor Barberton Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Barberton Public Library company nor Graves County Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barberton Public Library company nor Graves County Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Barberton Public Library company employs more people globally than Graves County Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barberton Public Library nor Graves County Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H