Comparison Overview

BAR Publishing

VS

Emmaus Academic

BAR Publishing

Banbury Road, OXFORD, OX2 7BP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

BAR Publishing is one of the world’s largest publishers of academic archaeology, and was recently awarded PLS Professional and Academic Publisher of the Year 2022 by the Independent Publishers Guild. Founded in 1974, there are now more than 3700 titles within the BAR International and British Series. We publish in five different languages (English, Italian, Spanish, French and German) and have served thousands of academics globally.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Emmaus Academic

1468 Parkview Circle, None, Steubenville, OH, US, 43952
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Emmaus Academic is the academic publishing arm of the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology. Its mission is to participate in the renewal of Catholic theology through publishing the very best in faithful scholarship. t is especially interested in scholarship that attempts the integration of Scriptural, Patristic, and Medieval traditions with modern approaches, and has a particular interest in the conversation between Thomism and the various theological schools that have arisen since the mid-20th century. The press is committed to the very highest in academic standards and to the catholic idea that the truth is ultimately translatable across schools of thought and across disciplines. It, therefore, aims to publish books that work across the boundaries between theology, Scripture, philosophy, history, linguistics, anthropology, and the other disciplines of the modern academy.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bar-publishing.jpeg
BAR Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmaus-academic.jpeg
Emmaus Academic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BAR Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Emmaus Academic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAR Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emmaus Academic in 2025.

Incident History — BAR Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAR Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Emmaus Academic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emmaus Academic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bar-publishing.jpeg
BAR Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmaus-academic.jpeg
Emmaus Academic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emmaus Academic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BAR Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Emmaus Academic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BAR Publishing company.

In the current year, Emmaus Academic company and BAR Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Emmaus Academic company nor BAR Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Emmaus Academic company nor BAR Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Emmaus Academic company nor BAR Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BAR Publishing company nor Emmaus Academic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BAR Publishing company nor Emmaus Academic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BAR Publishing company employs more people globally than Emmaus Academic company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BAR Publishing nor Emmaus Academic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.