Comparison Overview

Baptist Standard Publishing

VS

Asian Military Review

Baptist Standard Publishing

5151 Headquarters Dr, Plano, 75024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.baptiststandard.com

Baptist Standard Publishing is an independent, nonprofit media organization that provides content and resources focused on Baptists and global Christians, as well as the cultural contexts in which they live out their faith. Our mission is to inform, inspire and challenge people to live like Jesus. The Baptist Standard is the independent forum for Baptist voices speaking to the challenges of today’s world. We attract, support and collaborate with forward-looking people committed to historic Baptist ideals and the spectrum of Baptist voices.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Asian Military Review

75/8, 14th floor, Ocean Tower II, Soi Sukhumvit 19, Sukhumvit Road, Bangkok, Klongtoey Nue, TH, 10110
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asianmilitaryreview.com/

ASIAN MILITARY REVIEW is the largest circulated and only audited (ABC certified) defence magazine in Asia & Pacific region. The magazine is the the preferred professional reading of Asian military's and a reliable source of information for nearly all the key decision makers and advisers to the Asia Pacific defence forces. Asian Military Review has very relevant articles on capability analysis, special reports and relevant news coverage from the Asia Pacific region. It is a proven source by which Asian military professionals are kept up to date on issues that affect the military's ability to effect national and international defence and security issues. Asian Military Review is media partner and has bonus distribution at all leading aerospace and defence events worldwide.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptist-standard-publishing.jpeg
Baptist Standard Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asian-military-review.jpeg
Asian Military Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baptist Standard Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Asian Military Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baptist Standard Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asian Military Review in 2025.

Incident History — Baptist Standard Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baptist Standard Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Asian Military Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asian Military Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptist-standard-publishing.jpeg
Baptist Standard Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asian-military-review.jpeg
Asian Military Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baptist Standard Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asian Military Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Asian Military Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baptist Standard Publishing company.

In the current year, Asian Military Review company and Baptist Standard Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Asian Military Review company nor Baptist Standard Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Asian Military Review company nor Baptist Standard Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Asian Military Review company nor Baptist Standard Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing company nor Asian Military Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing company nor Asian Military Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Baptist Standard Publishing company and Asian Military Review company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing nor Asian Military Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References