Comparison Overview

Banner-man.co.uk

VS

Snap Circular Quay

Banner-man.co.uk

The Vault Barkerend Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, undefined, BD3 9AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Banner Man help you to shout about your Event, Product or Brand! We provide a large range of indoor and outdoor advertising banners and banner "Selfie Frames"​ to add the fun and entertainment to your event Canvas prints at a full range of sizes We work with Marketing and Event Agencies, Businesses and the general public Based in Bradford supplying supply UK wide Online orders: http://www.banner-man.co.uk/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Snap Circular Quay

6-8 Underwood Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

At Snap Circular Quay, it is our job to think outside the box, to design and then print stunning pieces of work to make all our clients look amazing. The ability to understand what people want, even when they may not be able to articulate it clearly, is the bedrock of our success. With offices, a design studio and state of the art production facilities in Sydney CBD and Docklands, Melbourne enables us to complete the majority of work in house and to achieve incredible quick turnarounds of a few days. We print white, clear & metallic inks, perfect bind, large format print & so much more. We are now the largest printer in the Snap Network employing over 30 staff and producing circa 18,000 jobs pa. Having a team that share the same core values has helped us achieve continuous growth with revenues north of $8m What we do :- ★ We value each one of our customers ★ Know that service is as equally as important as the finished product ★ Deliver an unbeatable product at a great cost What we are not :- ★ Just another printer or design agency If you need some advice and expertise to make sure you next project stands out from the crowd get in touch. Tel: 02 9224 7300 or email: [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snap-circular-quay.jpeg
Snap Circular Quay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Banner-man.co.uk
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snap Circular Quay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banner-man.co.uk in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snap Circular Quay in 2025.

Incident History — Banner-man.co.uk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banner-man.co.uk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snap Circular Quay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snap Circular Quay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banner-man.co.uk.jpeg
Banner-man.co.uk
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snap-circular-quay.jpeg
Snap Circular Quay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Banner-man.co.uk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Snap Circular Quay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Snap Circular Quay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Banner-man.co.uk company.

In the current year, Snap Circular Quay company and Banner-man.co.uk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Snap Circular Quay company nor Banner-man.co.uk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Snap Circular Quay company nor Banner-man.co.uk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Snap Circular Quay company nor Banner-man.co.uk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk company nor Snap Circular Quay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk company nor Snap Circular Quay company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Snap Circular Quay company employs more people globally than Banner-man.co.uk company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk nor Snap Circular Quay holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N