Comparison Overview

Simplii Financial

VS

ICICI Bank

Simplii Financial

Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to the Bank of Now. Simplii Financial is for those who live in the moment, with no-fee daily banking and tools that suit your life today. Ready? Set. #StartYourEngines

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 322
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400 051, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 800 and 849

ICICI Bank is one of India’s leading private sector banks, offering a wide range of banking products and services to corporate, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and individual customers across the country. The Bank offers multi-channel touch points including branches, ATMs, mobile banking, internet banking, and phone banking. The Bank has a network of 6,742 branches and 16,277 ATMs and cash recycling machines across India, as at December 31, 2024. For any assistance on products and services, please call ICICI Bank’s customer care number 1800 1080. Disclaimer: The content herein is only for information and does not amount to an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell, and is not intended to create any rights or obligations. It is also not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or would subject ICICI Bank Limited (“ICICI Bank”) or its affiliate(s) to any licensing or registration requirements. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute advice or opinion; please obtain professional advice before relying on any information contained herein. ICICI Bank disclaims any liability with respect to accuracy of information or any error or omission or any loss or damage incurred by anyone in reliance on the contents herein.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 164,277
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banksimplii.jpeg
Simplii Financial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Simplii Financial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICICI Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Simplii Financial in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Simplii Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Simplii Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICICI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banksimplii.jpeg
Simplii Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Network Processing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ICICI Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Simplii Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Simplii Financial and ICICI Bank have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, ICICI Bank company and Simplii Financial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor Simplii Financial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both ICICI Bank company and Simplii Financial company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor Simplii Financial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Simplii Financial company nor ICICI Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Simplii Financial company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ICICI Bank company.

ICICI Bank company employs more people globally than Simplii Financial company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Simplii Financial nor ICICI Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H