Comparison Overview

Bank of Baroda

VS

ANZ

Bank of Baroda

C-32, Bandra Kurla Complex Road, G Block BKC, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400051, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Founded in 1908 by Maharaja Sir Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III, Bank of Baroda is a top notch Public Sector Bank with a business of around Rs.10 trillion and network of 8100+ branches of which 105 overseas branches / offices are located in 17 countries excluding India spanning across Europe, US, Africa, Asia and Australia. Our mission is to be a top ranking National Bank of International Standards committed to augmenting stakeholders'​ value through concern, care and competence. Nurturing enduring relationships with all its stakeholders since 1908 is a reflection of Bank’s commitment to fuelling inclusive growth, fulfilling entrepreneurial dreams and meeting aspirations of generations around the globe. To make Banking experience more engaging and convenient, Bank has constantly reinvented its host of products, services, providing effective service to our customers through its 25000+ touch points including Branches, ATMs, E-lobbies, Special Mortgage Stores, SME Loan Factories, Agri. Loan Factories and Corporate Financial Services. Customer Centricity’ and ‘Growth with quality’ have been the driving philosophy of Bank of Baroda yielding rich dividends to all its stakeholders year after year, besides meeting ever growing aspirations of its customers. Social Media Policy: https://bit.ly/BOBSMP

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 31,985
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ANZ

833 Collins Street, Docklands, Melbourne, 3008, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

ANZ has a proud heritage of more than 180 years. Our purpose is to shape a world where people and communities thrive. That is why we strive to create a balanced, sustainable economy in which everyone can take part and build a better life. We employ more than 50,000 people and have our global headquarters in Melbourne. ANZ is among the top 4 banks in Australia, the largest banking group in New Zealand and Pacific, and among the top 50 banks in the world. Follow us elsewhere for our latest news: facebook.com/ANZAustralia facebook.com/ANZNewZealand twitter.com/ANZ_AU twitter.com/ANZ_NZ twitter.com/ANZ_Media twitter.com/ANZ_BlueNotes twitter.com/ANZ_Research instagram.com/anz_au bluenotes.anz.com

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,422
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankofbaroda.jpeg
Bank of Baroda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bank of Baroda
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ANZ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of Baroda in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANZ in 2025.

Incident History — Bank of Baroda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of Baroda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankofbaroda.jpeg
Bank of Baroda
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ANZ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank of Baroda company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ANZ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bank of Baroda company.

In the current year, ANZ company and Bank of Baroda company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ANZ company nor Bank of Baroda company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ANZ company nor Bank of Baroda company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ANZ company nor Bank of Baroda company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bank of Baroda company nor ANZ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ANZ company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bank of Baroda company.

ANZ company employs more people globally than Bank of Baroda company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bank of Baroda nor ANZ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N