Comparison Overview

Bank of the West

VS

Russian Standard Bank

Bank of the West

None, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

We’ve joined the BMO Family. Please note that we’re no longer monitoring or responding to comments. Reach out to https://www.linkedin.com/company/bmo-us/ with any questions. Follow BMO US: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bmo-us/ ©2023 Bank of the West is a trade name used by BMO Harris Bank N.A. Banking products and services are subject to approval and are provided by BMO Harris Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Bank of the West is not affiliated with BNP Paribas.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 5,232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Russian Standard Bank

None
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Russian Standard Bank - leading private bank in the lending market. Bank sells credit programs in more than 1,200 locations across the country. Number of clients of the bank exceeded 23 millions, the total amount of consumer loans exceeded $30 billions. The number of trading partners of the Bank over 35 thousand organizations.And since 2005, RSB has an exclusive production and service in the territory of Russia payment system American Express ®. Since 2006, JSC Russian Standard Bank has banking operations in Ukraine.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-the-west.jpeg
Bank of the West
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russian-standard-bank.jpeg
Russian Standard Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bank of the West
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Russian Standard Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of the West in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russian Standard Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Bank of the West (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of the West cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Russian Standard Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russian Standard Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-the-west.jpeg
Bank of the West
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical ATM Skimming Device
Motivation: Financial Gain (Likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Skimming
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russian-standard-bank.jpeg
Russian Standard Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Russian Standard Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank of the West company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bank of the West company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Russian Standard Bank company has not reported any.

In the current year, Russian Standard Bank company and Bank of the West company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Russian Standard Bank company nor Bank of the West company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bank of the West company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Russian Standard Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Russian Standard Bank company nor Bank of the West company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bank of the West company nor Russian Standard Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bank of the West company nor Russian Standard Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Russian Standard Bank company employs more people globally than Bank of the West company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bank of the West nor Russian Standard Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H