Comparison Overview

Bank of America

VS

Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility

Bank of America

100 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, US, 28202
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bankofamerica.com

Bank of America is one of the world's largest financial institutions, serving individuals, small- and middle-market businesses and large corporations with a full range of banking, investing, asset management and other financial and risk management products and services. The company serves approximately 56 million U.S. consumer and small business relationships. It is among the world's leading wealth management companies and is a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading. This LinkedIn company page is moderated. For more information, please visit: https://bit.ly/32FDdQr. For account issues, please visit: https://bit.ly/2GeTIeP.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 239,193
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility

1 rue Victor basch CS 70001 Massy Cedex, 91068, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ca-personalfinancemobility.com

A major consumer credit provider in Europe, Crédit Agricole Consumer Finance operates in 19 countries. Its 9,900 employees support customers by providing the financing they need to undertake their projects. Reflecting the essential social and economic role of consumer credit, Crédit Agricole Consumer Finance is committed to responsible relations when dealing with partners, customers and employees. Customer satisfaction, innovation and operational efficiency are central to its strategy. With a strong foothold in Crédit Agricole Group and serving retail banks, Crédit Agricole Consumer Finance offers a wide range of financing and insurance solutions though a multichannel distribution approach including direct sales, point-of-sale financing, e-commerce, partnerships and brokerage.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america.jpeg
Bank of America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/credit-agricole-consumer-finance.jpeg
Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bank of America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

Bank of America has 14.94% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility in 2025.

Incident History — Bank of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cr√©dit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america.jpeg
Bank of America
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error (Email Misconfiguration)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/credit-agricole-consumer-finance.jpeg
Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bank of America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bank of America company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bank of America company has reported more cyber incidents than Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company.

Neither Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company nor Bank of America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bank of America company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company nor Bank of America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bank of America company nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bank of America company nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bank of America company employs more people globally than Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bank of America nor Crédit Agricole Personal Finance & Mobility holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References