Comparison Overview

Camberley cabling solutions

VS

Magicfirm

Camberley cabling solutions

52 Victoria Avenue, Camberley, England, GU15 3HU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.CamberleyCablingSolutions.co.uk

CCS has over 20 years of combined experience in the field of data network installation. We can install both wired (copper and fibre) and wireless networks Our installation teams are used to working in any environment from home or home office installs to large corporate offices and everywhere in between. All our installations are 100% tested with Fluke DSX cable analysers. We can supply a manufacturer back warranty with all of our installations. We can supply and install all types of network hardware including routers, switches, firewalls etc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Magicfirm

14 Floor, Huaye BLDG-1, 511 JianYe Road | Binjiang District | Hangzhou, 310052 | CHINA, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN, 310052
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mbot3d.com

Magicfirm was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Hangzhou, China; Magicfirm Europe is located in Gothenburg, Sweden and Magicfirm Silicon Valley is located in San Jose, California. It was the first to offer 3D printing services within China. Magicfirm started manufacturing its 3D printers in 2011, the MBots. The MBot series of 3D printers were originally based on open-source hardware, but the company has since opened its R&D lab for developing next generation printers. Magicfirm not only manufactures its own desktop 3D printers, but also provides 3D printing and cloud services. Company History • September 2009: Magicfirm was founded. • November 2009: Provide WOW gamer character model customization service using Z Corp’s Z510 3D printer. • April 2010: Start offering 3D printing services for design companies and students. • June 2010: Become the official reseller of Z Corporation products in China. • May 2011: Production starts on the first generation MBot 3D Printers. • November 2011: Sales start for the MBot 3D Printers. • January 2012: Form a partnership with NextEngine in China. • April 2012: Research begins on the second generation of MBot 3D Printers. • April 2012: The 100th MBot 3D Printer is sold. • May 2012: Become the official reseller of BFB in China. • May 2012: Start providing 3D models online. • August 2012: The MBot Cube is released. • September 2012: MBot Cube begins to sell in the market. • October 2012: The 100th MBot Cube is sold. • February 2013: The PVC version of the MBot Cube is released. • May 2013: The MBot Cube II is released. • September 2013: Magicfirm attends TCT Show in the UK. • November 2013: MBot Grid II released. • July 2014: The Educational Department sets up a 3D printing lab in the Hangzhou Youth Palace. • June 2015: Magicfirm launches its 3D printing education program • July 2015: Participates in the e-Nable program

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banana-cable-co-ltd.jpeg
Camberley cabling solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magicfirm.jpeg
Magicfirm
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Camberley cabling solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Magicfirm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camberley cabling solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magicfirm in 2025.

Incident History — Camberley cabling solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camberley cabling solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Magicfirm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magicfirm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banana-cable-co-ltd.jpeg
Camberley cabling solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magicfirm.jpeg
Magicfirm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Camberley cabling solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Magicfirm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Magicfirm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Camberley cabling solutions company.

In the current year, Magicfirm company and Camberley cabling solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Magicfirm company nor Camberley cabling solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Magicfirm company nor Camberley cabling solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Magicfirm company nor Camberley cabling solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions company nor Magicfirm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions company nor Magicfirm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Magicfirm company employs more people globally than Camberley cabling solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Camberley cabling solutions nor Magicfirm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References