Comparison Overview

Baltimore Museum of Industry

VS

Nauticus

Baltimore Museum of Industry

1415 Key Highway, Baltimore, 21230, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The BMI was founded in 1977 as a project of the Mayor’s Office to collect for future generations the stories and histories of businesses that were leaving the city; stories that were in danger of being lost. In 1981, the BMI incorporated as a private 501 (c)(3) nonprofit educational institution to teach the public about the rapidly disappearing industrial heritage of the region. In May of that year, the Museum moved into the historic Platt Oyster Cannery (c1870) on Key Highway and opened to the public in November. The mission of the Baltimore Museum of Industry is to collect, preserve, and interpret the industrial and technological heritage of the Baltimore region for the public by presenting educational programs and exhibits that explore the stories of Maryland's industries and the people who created and worked in them. BMI’s education programs serve over 80,000 students, teachers and parents annually with activities that complement the Maryland state curriculum. Programs augment classroom learning to help students connect what they learn in school with real world concepts and ideas about work, industry and economy. The museum's dynamic galleries recreate historic factory and work settings and display hundreds of industrial objects. BMI provides numerous services to the community from tours to public programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nauticus

1 Waterside Dr, None, Norfolk, Virginia, US, 23510
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Nauticus is a maritime discovery center located along the waterfront in downtown, Norfolk offering a unique form of experiential learning for all ages. Through interactive exhibits and STEM to STERN programming, Nauticus uses the museum, Battleship Wisconsin, sailing center, and Schooner Virginia to tell the story of the maritime environment, industry, and the military.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-museum-of-industry.jpeg
Baltimore Museum of Industry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nauticus-foundation.jpeg
Nauticus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baltimore Museum of Industry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nauticus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltimore Museum of Industry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nauticus in 2026.

Incident History — Baltimore Museum of Industry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltimore Museum of Industry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nauticus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nauticus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-museum-of-industry.jpeg
Baltimore Museum of Industry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nauticus-foundation.jpeg
Nauticus
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Baltimore Museum of Industry company and Nauticus company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Nauticus company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baltimore Museum of Industry company.

In the current year, Nauticus company and Baltimore Museum of Industry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nauticus company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nauticus company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nauticus company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry company nor Nauticus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry company nor Nauticus company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baltimore Museum of Industry company employs more people globally than Nauticus company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor Nauticus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H