Comparison Overview

Baltimore Museum of Industry

VS

kidSTREAM Children's Museum

Baltimore Museum of Industry

1415 Key Highway, Baltimore, 21230, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The BMI was founded in 1977 as a project of the Mayor’s Office to collect for future generations the stories and histories of businesses that were leaving the city; stories that were in danger of being lost. In 1981, the BMI incorporated as a private 501 (c)(3) nonprofit educational institution to teach the public about the rapidly disappearing industrial heritage of the region. In May of that year, the Museum moved into the historic Platt Oyster Cannery (c1870) on Key Highway and opened to the public in November. The mission of the Baltimore Museum of Industry is to collect, preserve, and interpret the industrial and technological heritage of the Baltimore region for the public by presenting educational programs and exhibits that explore the stories of Maryland's industries and the people who created and worked in them. BMI’s education programs serve over 80,000 students, teachers and parents annually with activities that complement the Maryland state curriculum. Programs augment classroom learning to help students connect what they learn in school with real world concepts and ideas about work, industry and economy. The museum's dynamic galleries recreate historic factory and work settings and display hundreds of industrial objects. BMI provides numerous services to the community from tours to public programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

kidSTREAM Children's Museum

3100 Ponderosa Drive, Camarillo, CA, 93010, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

kidSTREAM Children's Museum is an emerging children's museum, coming soon to Ventura County! We will be a museum for all kids of all ages, and the STREAM in our name stands for: Science, Technology, Reading, Engineering, Arts and Math! kidSTREAM will provide an engaging environment where kids explore, play, and discover. Our vision is to inspire and empower kids to become critical thinkers, innovators, and life-long learners.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-museum-of-industry.jpeg
Baltimore Museum of Industry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kidstream-children's-museum.jpeg
kidSTREAM Children's Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baltimore Museum of Industry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
kidSTREAM Children's Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltimore Museum of Industry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for kidSTREAM Children's Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Baltimore Museum of Industry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltimore Museum of Industry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — kidSTREAM Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

kidSTREAM Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-museum-of-industry.jpeg
Baltimore Museum of Industry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kidstream-children's-museum.jpeg
kidSTREAM Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baltimore Museum of Industry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to kidSTREAM Children's Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, kidSTREAM Children's Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baltimore Museum of Industry company.

In the current year, kidSTREAM Children's Museum company and Baltimore Museum of Industry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither kidSTREAM Children's Museum company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither kidSTREAM Children's Museum company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither kidSTREAM Children's Museum company nor Baltimore Museum of Industry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry company nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry company nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baltimore Museum of Industry company employs more people globally than kidSTREAM Children's Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baltimore Museum of Industry nor kidSTREAM Children's Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N