Comparison Overview

Ballet Arkansas

VS

Alive Theatre

Ballet Arkansas

520 Main Street, Little Rock, AR, 72201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Ranked among the Top 100 Ballet Companies in America, Ballet Arkansas's world-class performances and education programs have touched the lives of more than HALF-A-MILLION Arkansans. The preeminent producer of dance programming in the region, Ballet Arkansas presents a vibrant repertory of the classics, masterworks of American dance, and premieres by the world's most daring dancemakers to an audience of more than 50K per year.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alive Theatre

US, 90807
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Alive Theatre Company is to establish theatre as an exciting and essential form of expression and entertainment for a new generation not yet aware of the potency of experiencing living art. Knowing that not all who wander are lost, this band of nomadic artists traverses the city of Long Beach, leaving no stone unturned in its quest for a more enlightened populace. By incorporating all art forms into the theatrical experience, Alive Theatre strives to strengthen the bonds among artists in the community of Long Beach and to act as a gateway through which audiences will explore the renaissance taking place in their very own neighborhoods. We at Alive Theatre recognize the growing apathy towards discovery in our world. So we set ourselves to this mission in hopes of keeping curiosity Alive.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ballet-arkansas.jpeg
Ballet Arkansas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alive-theatre.jpeg
Alive Theatre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ballet Arkansas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alive Theatre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ballet Arkansas in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alive Theatre in 2025.

Incident History — Ballet Arkansas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ballet Arkansas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alive Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alive Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ballet-arkansas.jpeg
Ballet Arkansas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alive-theatre.jpeg
Alive Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alive Theatre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ballet Arkansas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alive Theatre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ballet Arkansas company.

In the current year, Alive Theatre company and Ballet Arkansas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alive Theatre company nor Ballet Arkansas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alive Theatre company nor Ballet Arkansas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alive Theatre company nor Ballet Arkansas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ballet Arkansas company nor Alive Theatre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ballet Arkansas company nor Alive Theatre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ballet Arkansas company employs more people globally than Alive Theatre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ballet Arkansas nor Alive Theatre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N