Comparison Overview

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership

VS

National Trust for Historic Preservation

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership

1549 El Prado, San Diego, California, US, 92101
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bpcp.org

The Balboa Park Cultural Partnership is a nonprofit organization through which 26 arts, science and cultural institutions in Balboa Park, San Diego, collaborate to achieve greater organizational efficiency, innovation and excellence. The Partnership’s member institutions vary in size and type and include museums, performing arts groups and theatres, cultural centers, gardens and the San Diego Zoo. The Partnership was formed in 2003 to provide a means for members to identify and achieve collective goals and to speak with one voice on issues of mutual benefit and importance. The Board of Directors is comprised of executive directors of member institutions. Park staff, trustees and volunteers participate in the development and implementation of Partnership programs — Sustainability Program, Learning Institute, Park Pass, Art of Science Learning, and more. Check out bpcp.org for future learning opportunities!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Trust for Historic Preservation

600 14th Street NW , Suite 500, Washington, DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.SavingPlaces.org

For more than 75 years, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has led the movement to safeguard America’s historic places. A privately funded nonprofit organization, we work to protect America's historic sites; tell the full American story; build stronger communities; and invest in preservation's future. Thanks to the passion and dedication of our advocates and supporters, we’re able to protect hundreds of places every year. Help us save places that matter—for ourselves, each other, and our future together. While we encourage constructive discussion, we ask that you conduct yourself in a civil manner and treat others with respect. The National Trust monitors comments and may remove posts that it deems inappropriate.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 406
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balboa-park-cultural-partnership.jpeg
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-trust-for-historic-preservation.jpeg
National Trust for Historic Preservation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Trust for Historic Preservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Balboa Park Cultural Partnership in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Trust for Historic Preservation in 2025.

Incident History — Balboa Park Cultural Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Trust for Historic Preservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Trust for Historic Preservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balboa-park-cultural-partnership.jpeg
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-trust-for-historic-preservation.jpeg
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Trust for Historic Preservation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Trust for Historic Preservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company.

In the current year, National Trust for Historic Preservation company and Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Trust for Historic Preservation company nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Trust for Historic Preservation company nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Trust for Historic Preservation company nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company nor National Trust for Historic Preservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Trust for Historic Preservation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company.

National Trust for Historic Preservation company employs more people globally than Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership nor National Trust for Historic Preservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References