Balance
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849
Balance
NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Balance
VS
Toronto Guardian
Toronto Guardian
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
We feature locals to showcase the amazing talent the city has to offer. Discover new musicians, businesses, charities, chefs and comedians. Take a look at the city's past through our historical galleries. Find pets up for adoption and help them find a new home. If you have a suggestions of something that needs to be featured, please get in touch.
NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Balance
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Toronto Guardian
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Balance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Toronto Guardian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Balance in 2025.
Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Toronto Guardian in 2025.
Incident History — Balance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Balance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Toronto Guardian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Toronto Guardian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Balance
Incidents
No Incident
Toronto Guardian
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Balance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toronto Guardian company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Historically, Toronto Guardian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Balance company.
In the current year, Toronto Guardian company and Balance company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Toronto Guardian company nor Balance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Toronto Guardian company nor Balance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither Toronto Guardian company nor Balance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Balance company nor Toronto Guardian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Neither Balance company nor Toronto Guardian company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
Balance company employs more people globally than Toronto Guardian company, reflecting its scale as a Blogs.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Balance nor Toronto Guardian holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description
Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.
Description
Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.
