Balance
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849
Balance
NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Balance
VS
Gender on the Ballot
Gender on the Ballot
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
The Barbara Lee Family Foundation and the Women & Politics Institute at American University are proud to partner for Gender on the Ballot, a nonpartisan project to examine and contextualize gender dynamics in politics. As the conversation and culture around running for office in the United States continues to evolve, Gender on the Ballot will contribute to the national dialogue on gender and politics through accessible content from experts and practitioners.
NAICS: 519132
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Balance
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Gender on the Ballot
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Balance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gender on the Ballot
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Balance in 2025.
Incidents vs Blogs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gender on the Ballot in 2025.
Incident History — Balance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Balance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Gender on the Ballot (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gender on the Ballot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Balance
Incidents
No Incident
Gender on the Ballot
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Balance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gender on the Ballot company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Historically, Gender on the Ballot company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Balance company.
In the current year, Gender on the Ballot company and Balance company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Gender on the Ballot company nor Balance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Gender on the Ballot company nor Balance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither Gender on the Ballot company nor Balance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Balance company nor Gender on the Ballot company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Gender on the Ballot company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Balance company.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Balance nor Gender on the Ballot holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description
Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.
Description
Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.
