Comparison Overview

Balance GFX

VS

RedFish Graphics

Balance GFX

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Balance GFX develops visuals and original theme concepts, creating an exciting world for the ultimate casino slot gaming experience. Our team has helped influence visual design trends in the industry. With each release, we actively participate in the evolution of gaming by pushing the boundaries through mastering new techniques, redefining styles and refining the approaches to our work. Our games are visually engaging, innovative and memorable and we are committed to providing the most visually attractive and motivating casino entertainment.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RedFish Graphics

undefined, Ottawa, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

RedFish Graphics is an Ottawa-based graphic and web design company. I offer a wide range of services, from logo design and branding, to corporate newsletters and website design. I've also developed a specialization in working with non-profit organizations, many of whom are stuck with websites that they can't update. Whether you need a website built from scratch or are looking to improve an existing one, I will work with you to ensure that your new site is one that you can continue to update going forward, using user-friendly WordPress software.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balance-gfx.jpeg
Balance GFX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redfish-graphics.jpeg
RedFish Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Balance GFX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RedFish Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Balance GFX in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RedFish Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Balance GFX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Balance GFX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RedFish Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RedFish Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balance-gfx.jpeg
Balance GFX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redfish-graphics.jpeg
RedFish Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RedFish Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Balance GFX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RedFish Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Balance GFX company.

In the current year, RedFish Graphics company and Balance GFX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor Balance GFX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor Balance GFX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor Balance GFX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Balance GFX company nor RedFish Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Balance GFX company nor RedFish Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Balance GFX company and RedFish Graphics company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Balance GFX nor RedFish Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X