Comparison Overview

BAKXWAGENAAR

VS

Team Tony Cancer Foundation

BAKXWAGENAAR

Wethouder Ebbenlaan 166, Helmond, Noord-Brabant, NL, 5702 AG
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

BAKXWAGENAAR (BW) is een gecertificeerde arbodienst met een landelijk netwerk van ruim 70 professionals, zoals bedrijfsartsen, casemanagers en verzekeringsartsen. BW werd in 2001 opgericht als samenwerkingsverband van zelfstandig geregistreerde bedrijfsartsen en is sinds 2011 werkzaam onder het motto: werken aan gezondheid. Het vitaal en (duurzaam) inzetbaar houden van werknemers en het terugdringen van verzuim vragen continu om aandacht. Met onze (pro)actieve advisering en maatwerk ondersteuning brengen en houden wij de thema’s Vitaliteit, Inzetbaarheid en Verzuim in beweging. Wij streven ernaar om op dit gebied de betrokken partner met expertise te zijn, voor zowel werkgever als werknemer. Onze kernwaarden: Bij BW vinden we het van essentieel belang dat onze opdrachtgevers bij al onze professionals en diensten de volgende kernwaarden kunnen herkennen: - Betrouwbaarheid - Deskundigheid - Betrokkenheid Contactgegevens: Wethouder Ebbenlaan 166 5702 AG, Helmond T: 0492-218800

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Team Tony Cancer Foundation

3562 South Osprey Ave. Suite C, Sarasota, Florida, 34239, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to provide free peer-to-peer support and resources to cancer fighters, survivors, and caregivers so no one on Florida's Suncoast faces cancer alone. Company Overview Team Tony Foundation, Inc. was incorporated in 2010 by Tony McEachern, a brain cancer survivor. Tony's dedicated team is comprised of a diverse group of individuals who each bring their unique skills, talents, and experiences to those we serve. From cancer survivors, to business professionals, to caring, compassionate volunteers, our team is there to help guide you on your journey.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bakxwagenaar.jpeg
BAKXWAGENAAR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-tony-cancer-foundation.jpeg
Team Tony Cancer Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BAKXWAGENAAR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Team Tony Cancer Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAKXWAGENAAR in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Team Tony Cancer Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — BAKXWAGENAAR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAKXWAGENAAR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Team Tony Cancer Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Team Tony Cancer Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bakxwagenaar.jpeg
BAKXWAGENAAR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-tony-cancer-foundation.jpeg
Team Tony Cancer Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BAKXWAGENAAR company and Team Tony Cancer Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Team Tony Cancer Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BAKXWAGENAAR company.

In the current year, Team Tony Cancer Foundation company and BAKXWAGENAAR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Team Tony Cancer Foundation company nor BAKXWAGENAAR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Team Tony Cancer Foundation company nor BAKXWAGENAAR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Team Tony Cancer Foundation company nor BAKXWAGENAAR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR company nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR company nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BAKXWAGENAAR company employs more people globally than Team Tony Cancer Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BAKXWAGENAAR nor Team Tony Cancer Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H