Comparison Overview

Baker Love Lawyers

VS

Princeton Business Law

Baker Love Lawyers

30 Dan Rees St, Wallsend, 2287, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Baker Love Lawyers is a long-established Newcastle legal firm with an enviable reputation for consistently exceeding our client's expectations and efficiently achieving results. Ours is a transparent service delivered by a confident team with impressive legal expertise. At Baker Love, everything we do demonstrates our commitment to support your long-term or short-term needs when it comes to the law and legal issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Princeton Business Law

300 Witherspoon Street, Suite 201, Princeton, New Jersey, US, 08542
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a law firm dedicated to meeting the legal needs of entrepreneurs and the businesses they run. We believe in the power of being your counsel, always at the ready to be an engine for growth. So we commit to you: - To understand your business model, your operations, your risks, and your opportunities. - To apply that understanding to our advice and services, so that our work is constructive and our efforts are appropriate. - To structure our fees to fit within your budget and needs. - In each of these ways, to be available to you, as a member of your team. Princeton Business Law stands ready to help you with the big and small legal challenges and opportunities – the ones that arise in your day-to-day operations, and the strategic ones. Contact us for a free consultation — and to hear how we can help your business grow. (Princeton Business Law is The Law Office of Jason B. Meyer, LLC. Attorney advertising.) Formerly Meyer Business Law

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-love-lawyers.jpeg
Baker Love Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-business-law.jpeg
Princeton Business Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker Love Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Princeton Business Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Love Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Princeton Business Law in 2025.

Incident History — Baker Love Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Love Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Princeton Business Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Princeton Business Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-love-lawyers.jpeg
Baker Love Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-business-law.jpeg
Princeton Business Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker Love Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Princeton Business Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Princeton Business Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker Love Lawyers company.

In the current year, Princeton Business Law company and Baker Love Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Princeton Business Law company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Princeton Business Law company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Princeton Business Law company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers company nor Princeton Business Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers company nor Princeton Business Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baker Love Lawyers company employs more people globally than Princeton Business Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Princeton Business Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X