Comparison Overview

Baker Love Lawyers

VS

Franklins Solicitors LLP

Baker Love Lawyers

30 Dan Rees St, Wallsend, 2287, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Baker Love Lawyers is a long-established Newcastle legal firm with an enviable reputation for consistently exceeding our client's expectations and efficiently achieving results. Ours is a transparent service delivered by a confident team with impressive legal expertise. At Baker Love, everything we do demonstrates our commitment to support your long-term or short-term needs when it comes to the law and legal issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Franklins Solicitors LLP

8 Castilian Street, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN1 1JX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Franklins Solicitors LLP is one of the principal law firms in the Midlands with offices in Northampton and Milton Keynes. With an emphasis upon high quality service delivery, we are one of the most quality-assured firms in the regions and are rated Excellent on Trustpilot, from over 1,000 reviews. Open 5 days a week from 9:00am until 5:30pm, Franklins prides itself not only on the extent of its legal services, but also the emphasis it places upon client care. Accessibility, approachability and efficiency are at the heart of our client service delivery. Franklins specialises in Corporate Commercial work, Property, Family, Wills and Trusts, Employment law and HR, Intellectual Property advice, Litigation, Debt Recovery, Legal Process Outsourcing, Insolvency and Business Migration work. The wide range of legal services enables businesses and individuals alike to have all their legal needs handled by one firm. Franklins values this loyalty and in return offers clients the opportunity of joining our Franklins First scheme. If you are keen to work with a team that puts service delivery and your legal needs first then please contact us to see how we can help you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-love-lawyers.jpeg
Baker Love Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklins-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Franklins Solicitors LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker Love Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Franklins Solicitors LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Love Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklins Solicitors LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Baker Love Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Love Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Franklins Solicitors LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklins Solicitors LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-love-lawyers.jpeg
Baker Love Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklins-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Franklins Solicitors LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Baker Love Lawyers company and Franklins Solicitors LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Franklins Solicitors LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker Love Lawyers company.

In the current year, Franklins Solicitors LLP company and Baker Love Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Franklins Solicitors LLP company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Franklins Solicitors LLP company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Franklins Solicitors LLP company nor Baker Love Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers company nor Franklins Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Franklins Solicitors LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Baker Love Lawyers company.

Franklins Solicitors LLP company employs more people globally than Baker Love Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker Love Lawyers nor Franklins Solicitors LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X