Comparison Overview

Baker & Taylor

VS

Bibliotheca

Baker & Taylor

2810 Coliseum Centre Dr, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28217, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Baker & Taylor has been in business for over 190 years, offering an extensive selection of products and services for academic and public libraries. It is the only partner that can truly offer a one-stop shopping experience for all formats, including print, movies and music, and digital downloadable ebooks and audio content.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1,124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bibliotheca

11190 Hudson Blvd N, Lake Elmo, Minnesota, 55042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For over 50 years, Bibliotheca has partnered with libraries to meet the needs of their communities worldwide. Things are changing at lightning speed. It’s time to imagine what a library can do—what a library can be—today and tomorrow. ​ Libraries are competing with the best in consumer technologies and can’t afford to stick with the status quo. At Bibliotheca, we aren’t just keeping up with the times, we’re inventing the future. ​ Through integrated technology we reimagine how libraries function, to inspire and delight all kinds of people, wherever they are: at home, on the move, or within the library walls. ​ Bibliotheca works with over 30,000 libraries around the globe to make the library experience—physical and digital—seamless, intuitive, and inclusive. We work wonders for library staff too. ​ As degreed librarians and avid library users, we understand not only the unique management challenges that libraries face, but also what the future of library service will demand. ​ We pair global insight with strong local support, so no matter where you are, we’ve got a team nearby to help you make sure your library is ready. ​

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 543
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheca.jpeg
Bibliotheca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker & Taylor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bibliotheca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker & Taylor in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bibliotheca in 2025.

Incident History — Baker & Taylor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker & Taylor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bibliotheca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bibliotheca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheca.jpeg
Bibliotheca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker & Taylor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bibliotheca company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bibliotheca company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker & Taylor company.

In the current year, Bibliotheca company and Baker & Taylor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor Bibliotheca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor Bibliotheca company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baker & Taylor company employs more people globally than Bibliotheca company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H