Comparison Overview

Baker's Exchange

VS

At Large Magazine

Baker's Exchange

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bakersexchange.net

BAKER’S EXCHANGE began back in 1999 as the first ad-only black and white trade magazine directed to the bakery industry. We have re-launched the magazine in a full color format, both in print and online, as a marketplace for bakery suppliers to display goods and services. It is a simple but very effective marketing vehicle

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

At Large Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atlargemagazine.com

At Large: 2 words that set the new standard for contemporary publishing across multimedia, from printed matter to web-based interface and up-to-the-minute social media. At Large is a first class seat on an irreverent ride through form and content, fact and fiction, investigation and conversation, aesthetics and adventure, becoming without being, anywhere, anytime—it’s a state of mind.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker's-exchange.jpeg
Baker's Exchange
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-large-magazine.jpeg
At Large Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker's Exchange
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
At Large Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker's Exchange in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for At Large Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Baker's Exchange (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker's Exchange cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — At Large Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

At Large Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker's-exchange.jpeg
Baker's Exchange
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-large-magazine.jpeg
At Large Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Baker's Exchange company and At Large Magazine company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, At Large Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker's Exchange company.

In the current year, At Large Magazine company and Baker's Exchange company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither At Large Magazine company nor Baker's Exchange company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither At Large Magazine company nor Baker's Exchange company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither At Large Magazine company nor Baker's Exchange company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker's Exchange company nor At Large Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baker's Exchange company nor At Large Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

At Large Magazine company employs more people globally than Baker's Exchange company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker's Exchange nor At Large Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References