Comparison Overview

Bajaj Finserv

VS

Lloyds Banking Group

Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv House, Sakore Nagar Rd, Viman Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411014
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bajajfinserv.in

Founded in April 2007, Bajaj Finserv is the financial arm of the Bajaj group. We believe in a simple philosophy to never settle for good and go for great. This reflects in our extensive product portfolio that spans across 3 broad categories- lending, insurance and wealth advisory. With 24 products spread across 12 product lines, we're one of the fastest growing and most diversified NBFCs in India. Our footprint spans the length and breadth of India.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 64,942
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lloyds Banking Group

25 Gresham Street, London, UK, GB, EC2V 7HN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/

Our purpose is Helping Britain Prosper. We do this by creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for people and businesses, shaping finance as a force for good. We're part of an ever-changing industry and are currently on a journey to shape the financial services of the future, whilst supporting our customers’ changing needs. The scale and reach of our Group means we can offer a broad range of opportunities to learn, grow and develop. Our values-led culture and approach to inclusion and diversity means we can all make a real difference together.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 61,434
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bajaj Finserv
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lloyds Banking Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj Finserv in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lloyds Banking Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bajaj Finserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj Finserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lloyds Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lloyds Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2006
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lloyds Banking Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bajaj Finserv company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lloyds Banking Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bajaj Finserv company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lloyds Banking Group company and Bajaj Finserv company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Lloyds Banking Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Bajaj Finserv company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv company nor Lloyds Banking Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bajaj Finserv company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lloyds Banking Group company.

Bajaj Finserv company employs more people globally than Lloyds Banking Group company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor Lloyds Banking Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References