Comparison Overview

Bajaj Finserv

VS

L&T Finance

Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv House, Sakore Nagar Rd, Viman Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411014
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bajajfinserv.in

Founded in April 2007, Bajaj Finserv is the financial arm of the Bajaj group. We believe in a simple philosophy to never settle for good and go for great. This reflects in our extensive product portfolio that spans across 3 broad categories- lending, insurance and wealth advisory. With 24 products spread across 12 product lines, we're one of the fastest growing and most diversified NBFCs in India. Our footprint spans the length and breadth of India.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 64,942
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

L&T Finance

Plot no. 177, CST Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 098, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltfinance.com

L&T Finance is one of the leading NBFCs offering a range of loans across Rural | Housing | Two-Wheeler | Personal & Business (SME) The company is promoted by Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (L&T), one of the largest conglomerates in India. LTF is publicly listed on both the exchanges of India - BSE & NSE and complies to the guidelines applicable to an NBFC- CIC. Headquartered in Mumbai, the company has been rated AAA, the highest credit rating for NBFCs by four leading rating agencies.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,839
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bajaj Finserv
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&T Finance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj Finserv in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Finance in 2025.

Incident History — Bajaj Finserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj Finserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&T Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-finserv-lending.jpeg
Bajaj Finserv
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bajaj Finserv company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to L&T Finance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L&T Finance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bajaj Finserv company.

In the current year, L&T Finance company and Bajaj Finserv company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L&T Finance company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L&T Finance company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L&T Finance company nor Bajaj Finserv company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv company nor L&T Finance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bajaj Finserv company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to L&T Finance company.

Bajaj Finserv company employs more people globally than L&T Finance company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bajaj Finserv nor L&T Finance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References