Comparison Overview

Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc.

VS

MTAR Technologies Limited

Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc.

184 Gilbert Avenue, None, Memphis, Tennessee, US, 38106
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The mission of Bailey-Parks Urethane, Incorporated, is to serve the interests of our customers through the manufacturing and sale of exceptional products through a process of continuous self-improvement in areas of product quality, service and pricing that offers maximum value. Unlike many companies, if Bailey-Parks determines that a customer's needs would be best served by a material that is not urethane, the company will go out of its way to connect its client with a company that offers a better solution. Furthermore, we are committed to providing a safe and stable work environment for the employees of Bailey-Parks, and to provide jobs that provide opportunities for personal betterment. Bailey-Parks is committed to active and ongoing involvement in, and service to, our community, our city and beyond. We further pledge to make every effort to conduct all of our affairs in the most honest, ethical and moral manner possible as we seek to serve, honor and glorify the Lord of our lives, Jesus Christ.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MTAR Technologies Limited

18, Technocrats Industrial Estate, Balanagar,, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-06
Between 750 and 799

MTAR is a leading precision engineering, manufacturing and integrator firm. It is a major equipment supplier to India's prestigious Space, Nuclear, Defence & Aerospace programs. It is a one-stop solution provider for all engineering needs from design - manufacturing, and integration. It has 7 dedicated divisions in Hyderabad with over 300 state-of-the-art machines and in-house Heat Treatment and Surface Treatment facilities & large sized clean rooms. MTAR has an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) which serves to the leading fuel cell, oil, energy and aerospace multinationals like Schlumberger, GE, Bloom Energy, UTC Aerospace, Elbit, Rafael etc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 887
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-parks-urethane-inc-.jpeg
Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtar-technologies-pvt-ltd.jpeg
MTAR Technologies Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MTAR Technologies Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTAR Technologies Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MTAR Technologies Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTAR Technologies Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-parks-urethane-inc-.jpeg
Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtar-technologies-pvt-ltd.jpeg
MTAR Technologies Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MTAR Technologies Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MTAR Technologies Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company.

In the current year, MTAR Technologies Limited company and Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MTAR Technologies Limited company nor Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MTAR Technologies Limited company nor Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MTAR Technologies Limited company nor Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company nor MTAR Technologies Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company nor MTAR Technologies Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MTAR Technologies Limited company employs more people globally than Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bailey-Parks Urethane, Inc. nor MTAR Technologies Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H