Comparison Overview

Oliver Law Firm

VS

Swope, Rodante P.A.

Oliver Law Firm

3606 West Southern Hills Blvd, Rogers, Arkansas, 72758, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Oliver Law Firm is committed to providing the highest level of client service. Our attorneys place an emphasis on providing legal services that make sense from the client’s perspective. We are dedicated to helping you with any legal need. From car and 18 wheeler wrecks to wills and trusts to divorce or child custody, our attorneys are ready to listen and help you through the legal process.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swope, Rodante P.A.

1234 E. 5th Ave., Tampa, Florida, 33605, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Swope, Rodante P.A. was founded in 1979 on the core value of providing guidance and support for the catastrophically injured and underinsured. Over the past 33 years, the firm has had the honor of representing truly remarkable people who continue to inspire its attorneys and staff. To provide these clients with the highest level of integrity and dedication, Swope, Rodante P.A. focuses solely on civil litigation. This concentration has allowed the firm to acquire the expertise and skills necessary to successfully handle catastrophic injury and insurance bad faith cases. Its experienced team of attorneys and staff work on cutting edge legal issues and remain committed to having a positive impact on the justice system.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-and-oliver-law-firm.jpeg
Oliver Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swope-rodante-p.a..jpeg
Swope, Rodante P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oliver Law Firm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swope, Rodante P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oliver Law Firm in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swope, Rodante P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Oliver Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oliver Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swope, Rodante P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swope, Rodante P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-and-oliver-law-firm.jpeg
Oliver Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swope-rodante-p.a..jpeg
Swope, Rodante P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oliver Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swope, Rodante P.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swope, Rodante P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oliver Law Firm company.

In the current year, Swope, Rodante P.A. company and Oliver Law Firm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swope, Rodante P.A. company nor Oliver Law Firm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swope, Rodante P.A. company nor Oliver Law Firm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swope, Rodante P.A. company nor Oliver Law Firm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oliver Law Firm company nor Swope, Rodante P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oliver Law Firm company nor Swope, Rodante P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Swope, Rodante P.A. company employs more people globally than Oliver Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oliver Law Firm nor Swope, Rodante P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X