Comparison Overview

Bailey & Dixon, LLP

VS

The Francis Company

Bailey & Dixon, LLP

434 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since 1916, Bailey & Dixon has been regarded as one of North Carolina's most experienced and trusted law firms concentrating in administrative, business and insurance law, civil litigation, and governmental relations. We are not, and never will be, the largest law firm measured by number of offices or lawyers. Rather, we offer the experience and expertise of a large firm coupled with personal attention and cost efficiency necessary to resolve your problems. The attorneys who established Bailey & Dixon had the vision, ability and determination to build a first-rate law firm. Our size is and has been a deliberate, thoughtful process - we reject the notion that bigger is better. Most of our partners were originally associates. We are proud of our collegial environment, based upon mutual professional respect and personal friendships. Bailey & Dixon is distinguished by our commitment to integrity, our excellence in representing client needs and our track record of success.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Francis Company

31 West 16th Street, New York, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Francis Company is an intellectual property advisory company. Founded on deep in-house IP expertise, our lawyers provide a comprehensive set of domestic and global, industry-leading IP business and legal strategy and management services. Among our clients are US, foreign, and multi-national companies, start-ups, entrepreneurs, estates, and law firm IP practices. The Francis Company enables you to cost effectively bridge the gap between simply developing and managing your IP and using it to gain a tangible, sustainable business advantage and increase the value of your IP. Working with The Francis Company accelerates your IP agenda in a manner that can't be achieved alone. We also help you synchronize your IP strategy, protection, and monetization with appropriate staffing and operational resources and workflows. We advance your business objectives to secure a competitive edge, resulting in the highest return on IP investment for the long term. And, you will get more done in less time for less money.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-&-dixon-llp.jpeg
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-francis-company.jpeg
The Francis Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Francis Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bailey & Dixon, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Francis Company in 2025.

Incident History — Bailey & Dixon, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bailey & Dixon, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Francis Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Francis Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-&-dixon-llp.jpeg
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-francis-company.jpeg
The Francis Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bailey & Dixon, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Francis Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Francis Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bailey & Dixon, LLP company.

In the current year, The Francis Company company and Bailey & Dixon, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Francis Company company nor Bailey & Dixon, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Francis Company company nor Bailey & Dixon, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Francis Company company nor Bailey & Dixon, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP company nor The Francis Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP company nor The Francis Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bailey & Dixon, LLP company employs more people globally than The Francis Company company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bailey & Dixon, LLP nor The Francis Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X