Comparison Overview

Bailey & Wyant PLLC

VS

Trestle Law

Bailey & Wyant PLLC

500 Virginia Street East, Suite 600, Charleston, WV, 25301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bailey & Wyant, PLLC is a full-service defense law firm with offices in Charleston and Wheeling, West Virginia. Our philosophy is simple. We provide aggressive and effective legal representation, while being ever mindful of each client's individual needs, goals, and economic interests. No matter how complex or novel, our focus in a case is always to reach the right resolution for our client. For more information, please visit www.baileywyant.com or email us at [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trestle Law

undefined, San Diego, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Trestle Law, APC is a premier, full-service law firm based in San Diego, California. Specializing in intellectual property (IP), trademark, copyright, and patent law, we provide comprehensive legal solutions to individuals and businesses of all sizes. Our experienced attorneys are committed to protecting your business and its valuable assets against infringement and litigation. We also offer consultation services in contract law, ensuring your business transactions are legally sound. With our client-focused approach, we work diligently to understand your unique needs and tailor our legal strategies accordingly. Discover more about how Trestle Law can safeguard your business interests at trestlelaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-&-wyant-pllc.jpeg
Bailey & Wyant PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trestle-law.jpeg
Trestle Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bailey & Wyant PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trestle Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bailey & Wyant PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trestle Law in 2025.

Incident History — Bailey & Wyant PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bailey & Wyant PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trestle Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trestle Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bailey-&-wyant-pllc.jpeg
Bailey & Wyant PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trestle-law.jpeg
Trestle Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bailey & Wyant PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trestle Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trestle Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bailey & Wyant PLLC company.

In the current year, Trestle Law company and Bailey & Wyant PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trestle Law company nor Bailey & Wyant PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trestle Law company nor Bailey & Wyant PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trestle Law company nor Bailey & Wyant PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC company nor Trestle Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC company nor Trestle Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bailey & Wyant PLLC company employs more people globally than Trestle Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bailey & Wyant PLLC nor Trestle Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X