Comparison Overview

Badger Institute

VS

The Company Lab (CO.LAB)

Badger Institute

700 W Virginia St, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53204, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Badger Institute, formerly the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity. The institute’s research and public education activities are directed to identify and promote public policies in Wisconsin that are fair, accountable and cost-effective. Through original research and analysis and through public opinion polling, the institute’s work focuses on such issue arenas as state and local government tax policy and spending, including related program accountability, consequences and effectiveness. It also focuses on health care policy and service delivery; education; transportation and economic development; welfare and social services; and other issues that have or could have a significant impact on the quality of life and future of the state. The Badger Institute is guided by a belief that competitive free markets, limited government, private initiative and personal responsibility are essential to our democratic way of life.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Company Lab (CO.LAB)

1100 Market St., Suite 100, Chattanooga, TN, 37402, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Chattanooga's Front Door for Entrepreneurship. The Company Lab (CO.LAB) is a nonprofit startup accelerator that supports entrepreneurial growth in southeast Tennessee. Check out the variety of programs and events on our website, and schedule a Wayfinding Meeting with one of our staff members so we can find the best fit for you to get involved.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/badger-institute.jpeg
Badger Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-company-lab.jpeg
The Company Lab (CO.LAB)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Badger Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Company Lab (CO.LAB)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Badger Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Company Lab (CO.LAB) in 2025.

Incident History — Badger Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Badger Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Company Lab (CO.LAB) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Company Lab (CO.LAB) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/badger-institute.jpeg
Badger Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-company-lab.jpeg
The Company Lab (CO.LAB)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Badger Institute company and The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Badger Institute company.

In the current year, The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company and Badger Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company nor Badger Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company nor Badger Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company nor Badger Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Badger Institute company nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Badger Institute company nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Company Lab (CO.LAB) company employs more people globally than Badger Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Badger Institute nor The Company Lab (CO.LAB) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X