Comparison Overview

Backstage Library Works

VS

Biblionet Groningen

Backstage Library Works

25 East 1700 South, Provo, Utah, 84606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

It's all about access. Libraries, museums, and archives have collections whose greatest value is found when those materials can be discovered and viewed by patrons and researchers. These institutions are also charged with preserving collections for future access. Backstage Library Works provides professional services to cultural heritage institutions to help open and expand pathways to access in their collections. Services range from cataloging and non-MARC metadata to digitization and microfilming, from authority control and record enrichment to on-site inventory, reclassification, and RFID tagging. Backstage offers technology, expertise, and manpower that enable librarians and archivists to accomplish their goals.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Biblionet Groningen

De Mudden 18, Groningen, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Met ons netwerk van 32 bibliotheken, verspreid over de hele provincie Groningen, zijn we er voor alle Groningers. Onze inzet is het optimaliseren van leesvaardigheid, succes op school, een goede plaats op de arbeidsmarkt, een leven lang leren en jezelf staande houden in onze complexe kennissamenleving. Ontmoet, leer en ontdek!

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 265
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/backstage-library-works.jpeg
Backstage Library Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/biblionet-groningen.jpeg
Biblionet Groningen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Backstage Library Works
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Biblionet Groningen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Backstage Library Works in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Biblionet Groningen in 2025.

Incident History — Backstage Library Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Backstage Library Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Biblionet Groningen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Biblionet Groningen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/backstage-library-works.jpeg
Backstage Library Works
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/biblionet-groningen.jpeg
Biblionet Groningen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Biblionet Groningen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Backstage Library Works company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Biblionet Groningen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Backstage Library Works company.

In the current year, Biblionet Groningen company and Backstage Library Works company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Biblionet Groningen company nor Backstage Library Works company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Biblionet Groningen company nor Backstage Library Works company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Biblionet Groningen company nor Backstage Library Works company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Backstage Library Works company nor Biblionet Groningen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Backstage Library Works company nor Biblionet Groningen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Biblionet Groningen company employs more people globally than Backstage Library Works company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Backstage Library Works nor Biblionet Groningen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H