Comparison Overview

Ayers & Stolte, PC

VS

Millar & Bryce

Ayers & Stolte, PC

710 N. Hamilton Street, Richmond, VA, 23221, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Richmond legal firm of Ayers & Stolte is set apart by its people. While every law firm holds itself out to be distinctive for some reason, we are proud to have unprecedented trust and knowledge and rise above other firms with a distinctive and remarkable staff of attorneys. Our clients are solo practitioners, small businesses, individuals, banks, trustees and other law firms. As experienced Richmond lawyers, we serve our clients with one goal in mind; to help them gain, maintain and stay in control of their businesses, their families and their finances. If you are seeking Richmond legal experts in general practice, business law, or personal injury, then you should seek the legal advice of Ayers & Stolte. Contact Ayers & Stolte today at (804) 358-4731 or at www.ayerslaw.com for a free, honest case evaluation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Millar & Bryce

3 Lochside Way, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH12 9DT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Millar & Bryce is a leader in providing search and property reports to the Scottish legal profession. Our expertise, advanced technology and customer service help solicitors, estate agencies and commercial clients complete their property transactions successfully. We have offices in Edinburgh from which we serve our client base. We strive to digitise our services and customer platforms and introduce new innovative solutions to help our customers manage the entire property sale process. We offer dedicated Customer Care through our Customer Success Team in order to better understand and resolve our customers’ challenges. Millar & Bryce is part of the Landmark Information Group.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ayers-&-stolte-pc.jpeg
Ayers & Stolte, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/millar-&-bryce-ltd.jpeg
Millar & Bryce
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ayers & Stolte, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Millar & Bryce
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ayers & Stolte, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Millar & Bryce in 2025.

Incident History — Ayers & Stolte, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ayers & Stolte, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Millar & Bryce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Millar & Bryce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ayers-&-stolte-pc.jpeg
Ayers & Stolte, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/millar-&-bryce-ltd.jpeg
Millar & Bryce
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ayers & Stolte, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Millar & Bryce company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Millar & Bryce company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ayers & Stolte, PC company.

In the current year, Millar & Bryce company and Ayers & Stolte, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Millar & Bryce company nor Ayers & Stolte, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Millar & Bryce company nor Ayers & Stolte, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Millar & Bryce company nor Ayers & Stolte, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC company nor Millar & Bryce company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC company nor Millar & Bryce company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Millar & Bryce company employs more people globally than Ayers & Stolte, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ayers & Stolte, PC nor Millar & Bryce holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X