Comparison Overview

Axia Litigation Lawyers

VS

Jones & Swanson

Axia Litigation Lawyers

8 Market Ln, Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Axia Litigation Lawyers specializes exclusively in commercial and civil litigation and dispute resolution. We take pride in our meticulous attention to detail, strategic focus, and dedication to delivering clear, accurate, and timely legal advice. With an experienced litigation team covering a diverse range of practice areas, including but not limited to insolvency, corporate disputes, building and construction, employment issues, defamation, estate litigation, and debt recovery, you can trust that you are in safe hands.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jones & Swanson

635 Whitlock Avenue SW , Marietta, GA, 30064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Jones & Swanson, our attorneys are experienced in representing individuals and families injured in a variety of circumstances including motor vehicle accidents, premises liability, wrongful death, product liability, and medical malpractice. The firm takes great pride in its ability to provide people throughout Cobb, Fulton, Gwinnett, Cherokee, and surrounding counties with dedicated and superior representation. With over 40 years of combined experience, the attorneys at Jones & Swanson have the experience necessary to prosecute even the most complex injury claims. Our staff holds first-rate academic credentials, extensive courtroom experience, strong community ties, and a deep commitment to successful outcomes. The attorneys at Jones & Swanson have earned a reputation for the excellent representation of each of our clients. We have been successful in securing millions of dollars of relief on behalf of our clients. Our goal is to not only win your case, but to build a lasting relationship with you in the process.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axia-litigation-lawyers.jpeg
Axia Litigation Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-offices-of-andrew-w-jones.jpeg
Jones & Swanson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Axia Litigation Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jones & Swanson
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axia Litigation Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones & Swanson in 2025.

Incident History — Axia Litigation Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axia Litigation Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jones & Swanson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones & Swanson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axia-litigation-lawyers.jpeg
Axia Litigation Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-offices-of-andrew-w-jones.jpeg
Jones & Swanson
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jones & Swanson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Axia Litigation Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jones & Swanson company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Axia Litigation Lawyers company.

In the current year, Jones & Swanson company and Axia Litigation Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jones & Swanson company nor Axia Litigation Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jones & Swanson company nor Axia Litigation Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jones & Swanson company nor Axia Litigation Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers company nor Jones & Swanson company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers company nor Jones & Swanson company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jones & Swanson company employs more people globally than Axia Litigation Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Axia Litigation Lawyers nor Jones & Swanson holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X