Comparison Overview

AXA XL

VS

Gruppo Unipol

AXA XL

One Bermudiana Road, Hamilton, Bermuda, BM, HM08
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are a leading provider of insurance and reinsurance offering innovative risk management solutions for businesses worldwide. We partner with those who move the world forward, navigating complex risks and working across diverse industries to support and empower our clients. Note: We are currently experiencing some technical issues with our recruitment platform which we hope to resolve shortly, please be patient with us, thank you for your interest in jobs at AXA XL.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,555
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gruppo Unipol

Via Stalingrado 45 Bologna, Italy 40128, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Unipol Group is one of the leading insurance groups in Europe and the leader in Italy in Non-Life business (particularly in Motor and Health), with total premium income of 15.1 billion euros, including 8.7 billion in Non-Life business and 6.4 billion in Life business (2023 figures). Unipol adopts an integrated offering strategy and covers the full range of insurance products, operating mainly through its subsidiary UnipolSai Assicurazioni. The Group is also active in direct auto insurance (Linear Assicurazioni), transport and aviation insurance (Siat), health protection (UniSalute), supplementary pensions, and oversees the bancassurance channel (Arca Vita and Arca Assicurazioni). It also manages significant diversified activities in the real estate, hotel (UNA Group), health care (Centro Medico Santagostino) and agricultural (Tenute del Cerro) sectors. Unipol Gruppo S.p.A. is listed on the Italian stock exchange.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AXA XL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gruppo Unipol
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA XL in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruppo Unipol in 2026.

Incident History — AXA XL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA XL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gruppo Unipol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruppo Unipol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gruppo Unipol company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AXA XL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gruppo Unipol company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AXA XL company.

In the current year, Gruppo Unipol company and AXA XL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AXA XL company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gruppo Unipol company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AXA XL company.

AXA XL company employs more people globally than Gruppo Unipol company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AXA XL nor Gruppo Unipol holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.