Comparison Overview

AXA XL

VS

中国人民保险 PICC

AXA XL

One Bermudiana Road, Hamilton, Bermuda, BM, HM08
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.axaxl.com

We are a leading provider of insurance and reinsurance offering innovative risk management solutions for businesses worldwide. We partner with those who move the world forward, navigating complex risks and working across diverse industries to support and empower our clients. Note: We are currently experiencing some technical issues with our recruitment platform which we hope to resolve shortly, please be patient with us, thank you for your interest in jobs at AXA XL.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,555
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

中国人民保险 PICC

清华西路28号, 海淀区, 100084, CN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.picc.com

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Global 500 (2014) published by the Fortune magazine. The Company is an investment holding company. The Company operates its property and casualty insurance business through PICC Property and Casualty Company.The Company operates its life and health insurance businesses through PICC Life Insurance Company and PICC Health Insurance Company , The Company centrally and professionally manages most of its insurance assets through PICC Asset Management Company and PICC Investment Holding which is a professional investment company specializing in real estate investments. The Company also carries out non-transactional businesses such as equity and debt investments in insurance and non-insurance capital within and outside the Group through PICC Capital Investment Management Company.The Company has also made strategic investments in non-insurance financial businesses such as banking and trust.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 7,623
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AXA XL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
中国人民保险 PICC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA XL in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中国人民保险 PICC in 2026.

Incident History — AXA XL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA XL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 中国人民保险 PICC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中国人民保险 PICC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axaxl.jpeg
AXA XL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AXA XL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 中国人民保险 PICC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 中国人民保险 PICC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AXA XL company.

In the current year, 中国人民保险 PICC company and AXA XL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor AXA XL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AXA XL company nor 中国人民保险 PICC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AXA XL company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 中国人民保险 PICC company.

AXA XL company employs more people globally than 中国人民保险 PICC company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AXA XL nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References